Answer:
Authoritative.
Explanation:
An authoritative parenting is that which is characterized by a high responsability, high responsiveness and high demands. This type of parent take care of the child's emotional needs but still have high standars. Like in the example that the exercise provides: Janet knows his son is tired but tells him to finish his assignment (high standars) and offers her help (high responsiveness) and to sleep an extra hour in the morning.
In a primitive tribe, Shantu fights with the other young men his age to impress the young women. As it turns out, several young women are attracted to him because he seems to be able to protect them and is rising in social status. In essence, Shantu's aggression can be explained in evolutionary terms as a display of <u> economic and social competition</u>
<h3>What is
primitive tribe?</h3>
"Primitive tribal group" was the term given to this subcategory. A pre-agricultural way of life, or the practice of hunting and gathering, zero or negative population growth, and a very low literacy rate in compared to other tribal groups are some characteristics of this group.
Groups were designated PTGs if they met any one of the criteria. 52 towns were classified as a "primitive tribal group" at the conclusion of the Fifth Five Year Plan, based on suggestions made by the corresponding state governments. Twenty new groups were added at the conclusion of the sixth five-year plan, two more groups in the seventh five-year plan, and one more group in the eighth five-year plan, for a total of 75 groups.
To learn more about primitive tribe from the given link:
brainly.com/question/16726546
#SPJ4
Answer:
Social Issues and Community Interactions
This chapter examines social issues involved in the siting and operation of waste-incineration facilities (such as incinerators and industrial boilers and furnaces), including possible social, economic, and psychological effects of incineration and how these might influence community interactions and estimates of health effects. Issues with respect to perceptions and values of local residents are also considered. In addition, this chapter addresses risk communication issues and approaches for involving the general public to a greater extent in siting and other decisions concerning incineration facilities. The committee recognized at the outset of its study that the social, economic, and psychological effects for a particular waste-incineration facility might be favorable, neutral, or adverse depending on many site-specific conditions and characteristics. However, the current state of understanding for many issues considered in this chapter is such that little or no data specific to waste incineration were available for analysis by the committee. In such cases, the committee identified key issues that should be addressed in the near future.
The social, psychological, and economic impacts of incineration facilities on their locales are even less well documented and understood than the health effects of waste incineration. When environmental-impact assessments are required for proposed federal or state actions, they typically must include socioeconomic-impact assessments, but the latter are often sketchy at best. They also might be given short shrift in the decision-making process (Wolf 1980; Freudenburg 1989; Rickson et al. 1990). Furthermore, these socioeconomic assessments attempt to be prospective—that is, they assess the likely effects of proposed actions. Little research has been done to evaluate systematically the socioeco-
Page 218
Suggested Citation:"Social Issues and Community Interactions." National Research Council. 2000. Waste Incineration and Public Health. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5803.×
Add a note to your bookmark
nomic impacts of controversial waste-treatment or waste-disposal facilities that have been in place for several years or more (Finsterbusch 1985; Seyfrit 1988; English et al. 1991; Freudenburg and Gramling 1992). Moreover, the committee is not aware of any studies of the effects of removing an established incinerator. One reason for the lack of cumulative, retrospective socioeconomic-impact research is the lack of sufficient data. Although incineration facilities must routinely monitor and record emissions of specified pollutants, health-monitoring studies before or after a facility begins operation are only rarely performed, and periodic studies of the socioeconomic impacts of a facility over time are virtually nonexistent, partly because of methodological problems (Armour 1988) and the absence of regulations that necessitate continued monitoring of socioeconomic impacts.
Explanation:
Answer:
A producer who has a <u>"comparative advantage"</u> experiences less cost when producing that good when compared with another producer.
Explanation:
When a producer is able to produce goods at a lower opportunity cost than the cost of other producers or partners of trade, than the term which is used in economics for this is comparative advantage. When you sell goods at lower cost than the others, it’s obvious that you will get stronger sale margins because everyone will buy your products.
The moon is nothing but a oight mirror of the sun. So some light from the sun lights a part of the moon(depending on it's position) . On different days the moon has different position(taking sun as reference) so it is diferently lighted. This creates the phases
