I think the approach that often used is Constructivism.
Often times, in a specific society , there will be a characteristic of pattern and behaviors that are tolerated and the one that don't.
For example, in Eastern culture, it is not tolerated to call someone that is older solely by name.
They left them religious freedom, to have belief in what they choose
Eventually <u>10</u>% of the united states would be given away through the homestead act.
To help expand the yank West and spur a financial boom, Congress handed the home Act of 1862, which supplied 160 acres of federal land to everyone who agreed to farm the land. The act disbursed millions of acres of western land to character settlers.
The Homestead Act, enacted all through the Civil struggle in 1862, furnished that any grownup citizen, or supposed citizen, who had never borne fingers in opposition to the U.S. government should declare 160 acres of surveyed authorities land. Claimants were required to stay on and “enhance” their plots with the aid of cultivating the land.
Learn more about Homestead Act here brainly.com/question/18126500
#SPJ4
Answer:
yup that's it please like
Explanation:
জনপ্রশাসন মন্ত্রণালয় ..
The correct interpretation of this case is that antibiotic A is the only one that effectively fights the patient's bacteria.
<h3>How to interpret the results?</h3>
To interpret the results of this case, we must take into account the manifestations that occur with respect to the antibiotic samples A, B, C and D and their reaction with the bacteria in the patient's wound.
According to the above, it can be inferred that antibiotic A eliminated the bacteria, while the other three antibiotics allowed the proliferation of bacteria.
Learn more about antibiotics in: brainly.com/question/10868637
#SPJ1
