True, I believe so if not then correct me.
Answer:
It's best to invest in the second economy
Explanation:
The question does not provide information on the hypothetical economic expectations of the two economies, but as a risk-averse investor, it's a better idea to try to "spread" the risk instead of concentrating it.
In the first economy, conditions might or might not be good. If they are good, returns will be extraordinary because all stocks will provide good returns, but if conditions take a turn for the worse, all stocks prices will fall and the financial consequences will be catastrophic.
In the second economy, results might never be as good as in the first economy, but they also will not ever be as bad. The risk is spread between various stocks, and while some may fall in price, others will rise, and viceversa. For a risk-adverse investor, this a far better option.
Answer:
A production combination outside of the PPF is unattainable by the economy with the given resources and technology.
This represents the Concept of scarcity in economics.
If the economy wishes to achieve the production point outside the frontier, they will have to enhance the production possibility capacity by introducing new technology or finding new resources.
Explanation:
First option.
Indeed, some people may benefit by paying the artificial price, but not all as other people may not be able to satisffy all their demand as a price ceiling will also effectively create a shortage due to the low prices disincentivizing producers.
