Answer:
Kanban container size = 73
Number of kanbans needed = 5
Explanation:
Kanban container size (Q):
Q = SQRT [(2 x D x S) / H x (1 - d/p)]
where,
D = Annual demand
S = Setup cost
H = Holding cost
d = Daily usage
p = Daily production
Putting the given values in the above formula,
CONTAINER SIZE = SQRT ((2 * ANNUAL DEMAND * SETUP COST) / (HOLDING COST * (1 - (DAILY USAGE / DAILY PRODUCTION))))
Q = SQRT [(2 x 4,000 x $30) / $125 x (1 - 16/25)]
Kanbans container size = 73 units (Rounding off to the nearest whole number)
NUMBER OF KANBANS = DEMAND DURING LEAD TIME + SAFETY STOCK / SIZE OF CONTAINER
K = ((16 * 16) + (4 * 25) / 73 = 5
Answer:
The gain that Sheridan should recognize on this exchange is $135000
Explanation:
Where Exchange Transaction lacks commercial substance, the asset that is acquired is measured at the <em>Carrying Amount or Undepreciated Cost </em> of the asset given up.
The gain will then include an <em>further consideration acquired</em> on the exchange of an asset.
<u>Entries to record the exchange are as follows :</u>
Cash $135000 (debit)
New Asset at undepreciated cost $420300 (debit)
Cost of Old asset given up $420300 (credit)
Gain on exchange $135000 (credit)
Conclusion :
The gain that Sheridan should recognize on this exchange is $135000
Answer:
When someone starts their own business, they do it because they firmly believe that they will succeed. Most of the time they are not thinking about what will happen if things do not work as planned. I believe that people that are afraid and believe that the possibility of failure is large, will never start their own business. Entrepreneurship is something that not everyone can do, and it takes a lot of guts to do it.
Answer:
A) Laws represent the minimum guidelines that companies must follow,whereas a firm's ethical stance may venture beyond the minimum level of compliance.
Explanation:
In the given scenario there are laws that allows community and state police to set up sobriety check points that discourages drunk drivers and saves lives.
The inclusion or removal of applications that helps drunk drivers avoid these checkpoints is not covered by the law. So if a company decides to include such applications it is at their discretion.
Blackberry have chosen to remove applications that helps drunk drivers avoid checkpoints. This is an example of when a company has ventured beyond the minimum level of compliance because of their ethical stance.
Google and Apple however have only ventured beyond the minimum compliance level because they have refused to honour requests by legislators to remove apps that permit smartphone users to navigate around the checkpoints.
