The answer, I believe, is A. Class Conflict.
C. United States v Nixon.
"The President wants me to argue that he is as powerful a monarch as Louis XIV, only four years at a time, and is not subject to the processes of any court in the land except the court of impeachment." Sirica denied Nixon's motion and ordered the President to turn the tapes over by May 31.
Proponents of an <u>integrative mind design</u> would argue that your awareness of the context affected your interpretation of the ambiguous word.
<u>Explanation</u>:
Integrative thinking is the ability of thinking and producing a creative solution out of two opposing ideas. This kind of scenario occurs when the person is under tension.
The created solution should be common to both the situation and superior to both.
The new idea is created to face the situation in tension. This is known as integrative thinking.
In the above scenario, the sister yelled at her sister on seeing the barking dogs surrounding her. It used the term be_ le instead of beagle. This is was due to tension.
