Companies may try to lower their labor costs by laying off higher paid workers.
Typically the higher paid workers will be professionals who have worked their way up over time and tend to be older, while younger workers fresh out of school and looking for their first jobs will be more willing to take lower salaries.
Answer:
a. It is not a fair deal for me.
The question is how much is $1,000 today when received in 12 months' time from now. The present value of $1,000 at 5% effective interest rate is $952 ($1,000 * 0.952). The other repayment of $1,100 in 2 years' time from now is worth $997.70 today at the 5% effective interest rate. This implies that my friend is repaying me $1,949.70 in present value terms.
For friendship sake, I may lend her the money, but in economic analysis terms, the NPV value will yield a negative value of $50.30 ($2,000 - $1,949.70). My friend is not actually paying me back the amount I would lend to her. She is paying me less than I actually would lend to her.
b. Cash Flow Diagram:
Year 1 Year 2
F1 F2
$1,000 $1,100 (Inflows)
Fo⇵.................⇵.......................⇵...........................⇵n period
Year 0
$2,000 (outflows)
Explanation:
The cash flow diagram for this loan is the graphical representation of the timing of the cash flows with a clear marking of the repayments made by my best friend in two instalments and the $2,000 that I lent to her. This cash flow diagram presents the flow of cash as arrows on a timeline scaled to the magnitude of the cash flow, where outflows are down arrows and inflows are up arrows.
The Net present value (NPV) of this loan shows the difference between the present value of repayments by my best friend and the present value of $2,000 that I lent to her over a period of 2 years. To obtain this difference, the present values of cash inflows of $1,000 in a year's time and $1,100 in two years' time are determined using the discount factor table based on the given interest rate of 5%.
Answer:
Solid works
Explanation:
I recommend this, but it is more on the designing side, more than the architecture side.
Answer:
the question is incomplete:
It happens that the set of consumption bundles (xA,xB) such that Charlie is indifferent between (xA,xB) and (20,5) is the set of all bundles such that xB = 100/xA. The set of bundles (xA,xB) such that Charlie is just indifferent between (xA,xB) and the bundle (10,15) is the set of bundles such that xB = 150/xA.
I also found the attached graph.
The requirements are:
- Is (30,5) ≈ (10,15) true or false?
- Is (10,15) > (20,5) true or false?
- Is (20,5) ≥ (10,10) true or false?
- Is (24,4) ≥ (11,9.1) true or false?
- Is (11,14) > (2,49) true or false?
- A set is convex if for any two points in the set, the line segment between them is also in the set. Is the set of bundles that Charlie weakly prefers to (20,5) a convex set?
- Is the set of bundles that Charlie considers inferior to (20,5) a convex set?
- The slope of Charlie’s indifference curve through a point, (xA,xB), is known as his ______________ ___ of ___________ at that point.
- Find Charlie’s marginal rate of substitution at the point (10,10).
- Find Charlie’s marginal rate of substitution at the point (5,20).
- Find Charlie’s marginal rate of substitution at the point (20,5).
- Do the indifference curves you have drawn for Charlie exhibit diminishing marginal rates of substitution?
Answers:
- true, they are on the same red line
- true, (10,15) is on the red line while (20,5) is on the blue line
- true, they are equivalent since both are on the blue line
- false, (11,9.1) is on the blue line and (24,4) is on the red line
- true, (11,14) is on the red line while (2,29) is on the blue portion
- yes, it is a convex set
- no, they are not a convex set
- The slope of Charlie’s indifference curve through a point, (xA,xB), is known as his <u>RATE</u> of <u>SUBSTITUTIO</u>N at that point.
- marginal rate of substitution at (10,10) = -10/10 = -1
- marginal rate of substitution at (5,20) = -20/5 = -4
- marginal rate of substitution at (20,5) = -5/20 = -1/4 = -0.25
- yes, this curves shows diminishing marginal rates of substitutions, e.g. goes from -4 to -1 to -0.25
Answer:
To estimate the total percentage of total outstanding stocks globally held unhedged on the trading books of top investment bank dealers, is the number of issued shares minus the number of shares held in the banks´ treasury, or the number of stocks outstanding, without considering the float.
Explanation:
The float or stock shares outstanding not held by individuals or associated corporations, percentage of 10% to 20%, is considered low and it means that the amount of available shares is not high. This percentage also gives you the idea on the stocks´ volatility.