Answer:
Steve Jobs coming back, Innovations, and Tim Cook taking over as COO
Explanation:
The fluctuations in stock prices of a company are due to improved performance of the company in meeting it's objectives and perception that the business will do better in the future.
In the given scenario there was an initial increase in Apple’s stock price from $27.97 to $702.10, an increase of 25 times.
This can be attributed to the return of Steve Jobs as the CEO of Apple. There was a confidence boost by his coming back. Also there were various innovations like: iPhone, iMac, iPod, and iTunes. These improved the performance and by extension share price of Apple.
However when Tim Cook took over as COO he reduced production by half resulting in stock price decrease by 37% from its peak in September 2012 until the end of March 2013, from $702.10 to $442.66.
Answer:
the banks will eventually make new loans totaling 9,000 and the money supply will increase by 10,000
Explanation:
The money multiplier is 1/0.10= 10. If 1,000 new dollars of currency are deposited in the banks, they must hold $100 as required reserves and can lend out $900. Through the money multiplier, loans will increase by $900*10= $9000. The expansion of the money supply is the original deposit + the increase in loans or $1,000+ $9,000= $10,000
Answer:
$ 464,120
Explanation:
Calculation to determine what The amount of manufacturing overhead that would have been applied to all jobs during the period is closest to:
Estimated overhead Rate = ( Estimated Fixed Manufacturing Overhead) / (Estimated Machine Hours )
Estimated overhead Rate = $ 492,000 / 30,000 hours
Estimated overhead Rate = $ 16.4 / hr
Total amount of overhead =Overhead Rate × Actual total machine-hours
Total amount of overhead = $ 16.4 / hr × 28,300 hours
Total amount of overhead= $ 464,120
Therefore The amount of manufacturing overhead that would have been applied to all jobs during the period is closest to:$ 464,120
Explanation:
This is a complex issue that may reflect on the organizational culture of that company. As a leader, it is necessary to understand the situation and listen to both parties in order to find a favorable solution for the company and the employees. Since Marshall's work is important to the company, firing him at first may not be a favorable decision, what the leader can do is provide feedback to him about his interpersonal relationship at the company.
As an effective leader, it is necessary to constantly monitor the work and the relationship between employees, in which case it is necessary to understand the reason for Marshall's behavior and try to change the parameters and procedures that may be facilitating this behavior. It is necessary for him to understand that despite being an effective worker, the company is an integrated system that must be in perfect synchronicity for it to be successful in the market.
What the leader could do in this case then is to try to change the code of organizational ethics, seek training and psychological assistance for Marshall if necessary, talk to the workers who are part of the conflict to understand the situation in the best way, to seek a work redesign. , etc.
Answer:
The correct solution is "$42.94".
Explanation:
The given values are:
D0 = 4
Ks = 15%
As we know,
⇒ 
By using the Gordon Model, we get
⇒ 
($)
