Answer: C, tell the audience what you have told them
Explanation:
The purpose of the conclusion is to summarize your main points and to prepare the audience for the end of your speech. ... It is especially important to remember that the conclusion of your speech is not the time to introduce new points or new supporting evidence; doing so will only confuse the audience.
Cause they didn't put their hands up and got knocked out
Answer:
Bounded rationality.
Explanation:
Tonya was feeling the effects of bounded rationality. According to Herbert Simon, people’s rationality is limited when making a decision. The rationality is limited by the information the person has, by the cognitive limitations and the time available to make the decision. In this case, if Tonya had been really rational she would have chosen the overseas company. However, she lacked information about shipment and that uncertainty led her to choose the domestic company instead, even if it had many disadvantages.
I think that the best answer is
<span>B people were not careful about preventing waste and contamination, although one could also find good arguments in favour of A and C.
A big problem was that oil was very easy to find, so people didn't protect every source and were often wasteful, letting the oil spill to the ground.
Taking precautions to prevent pollution is always more costly than not doing it, so it could be argue that this did not change, and is therefore not applicable as an answer to this question.</span>
Answer:
Using specific answers
Explanation:
Being specific to gather precise and accurate answers, and It gives you a question that is not vague or hard to answer. "Ask questions like, does the shape of dew drops change in different areas", or "significance of different sized dew drops". These questions are more specific than, "whats up with dew drops", or just searching "dew drops".
