Government is the term that describes the formal institutions and procedures through which a territory and its people are ruled. Governments vary in their structure, in their size, and in the way they operate.
<h3>What are the roles and responsibilities of government?</h3>
- First of all, the government is responsible for maintaining law and order in the country. They must provide the necessary funding to build an effective and capable police force, a justice system that serves all citizens equitably, and a well-trained defense force. For all three levels of government, security is a top priority.
- After providing top security, the government must focus on the well-being of the people.
- In addition to the former two, the government must prioritize the conservation of nature and the environment.
- Government is also responsible for improving a country's agricultural sector by enacting mandatory rules and regulations.
To learn more about government from given link
brainly.com/question/2034176
#SPJ4
Well if you want to know how it would be not very effective there you go
They had more soldiers, they had more commanders, using the commanders advantage they usually flanked Lee for easy victories,
<span>The answer is "Aggression and competition".
Sociobiology, the deliberate investigation of the organic premise of social conduct. The term sociobiology was promoted by the American researcher Edward O. Wilson in his book Sociobiology: The New Synthesis (1975). Sociobiology endeavors to comprehend and clarify creature (and human) social conduct in the light of normal choice and other natural procedures.
</span>
Answer: A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss aversion will provide additional motivation
.
Options:
A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss
aversion will provide additional motivation
B. designating a charity should be more effective because it avoids all potential for loss
C. it shouldn’t matter whether one designates a charity or anti-charity
D. self-interest biases generally keep people from choosing the anti-charity
Explanation:
The study of behavioral Economics shows that people are more driven by the loss of fear than the hope of gain. This is known as loss aversion. In commitment contracts where penalty money is promised to a charity or an anti-charity if the goal is not achieved, those who promise their money to an anti-charity tend to achieve their goals more. The same also applies when comparing this group and those who do not have to forego anything if they do not meet their target.
This is because giving to a charity will still seem beneficial while losing the money to an anti-charity will seem like a total loss.
