When scholars and justices interpret the Constitution with the view that the courts should reject any active lawmaking functions and follow precedent, refers to Judicial Restraint.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The judicial branch is conferred with the power of interpretation of the law. Many times while exercising the power of judicial activism there is always a chance that justices may exceed their power. Hence, the theory of judicial restraint was evolved.
By judicial restraint, judges are encouraged to exercise their power with certain limits and to respect and follow stare decisis. This ensures that judges are not intruding into the realm of the legislature by involving themselves in law making.
During a criminal trial where Emerly was found guilty, evidence was presented against her which Emerly and her lawyer feel was unfairly prejudicial. ... If an appeals court finds that the evidence against Emerly should have been excluded, she can receive a new trial.
Hope this helps
Answer:
(A) there will be a shortage of the new yogurt because the new yogurt is in high demand
Explanation:
Answer:
Wafula should sue the college
Explanation:
The college is responsible for keeping the student's safe atleast while they are still in the custody of the school. The college is also responsible for hiring drivers in whose hands the life of the students lies during transport. Therefore based on the narration given, which gives clear evidence showcasing negligence on the path of the driver. In other to forestall future occurence, the college should be sued for their driver's negligence being the employer. The college may decide to come up with more rigorous employment tests when hiring to forestall avoidable mistakes of this sort in the future.
