1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Marta_Voda [28]
2 years ago
12

Which of the following ideals from the Magna Carta was used in setting up

Law
1 answer:
madreJ [45]2 years ago
7 0
Even leaders are not above the law.
Some watered-down history: King John abused his power and would unfairly tax his people and broke many laws. Barons grew angry of his abuse and started a rebellion which forced King John to sign the Magna Carta. It established the idea that no one is above the law. In the US’s govt. and Constitution it is know as “supreme law of the land”

The other answers are ideas of John Locke.
You might be interested in
Q1. Add prefixes to the following words to change their meanings.
vesna_86 [32]

Answer:

a. not sure

b. illiterate

c. not sure.

d. unnecessary

e. not sure

f. imprecise

g. dishonest

h. untangle

i. indeed ( maybe )

j. not sure

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
with reference to the company act in Kenya ,describe the capacity of a company to enter into a binding contract.​
zysi [14]

Answer:

To enter into a binding contract, you have to be show that the presentation for the contract is made in a well label manner

4 0
3 years ago
What is the minimum age to run for u.s hous of representatives
liubo4ka [24]

Answer:

3 ggggggggggggggggggggggggg

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A paragraph discussing which pieces of evidence, if any, could have class
NemiM [27]

Answer:

Evidence

Explanation:

In general, all forms of evidence have class or individual characteristics. Class characteristics are not unique to a particular object but place the particular bit of evidence into a group of objects. Individual characteristics narrow down the evidence to a single, individual source.

In general, all forms of evidence have class or individual characteristics. Class characteristics are not unique to a particular object but place the particular bit of evidence into a group of objects. Individual characteristics narrow down the evidence to a single, individual source.The type of handgun with which a victim is shot is a class characteristic. For example, if the bullet came from a .38 caliber handgun, every .38 caliber handgun on the planet is the possible murder weapon. However, finding a suspect’s fingerprint (an individual characteristic) on a .38 caliber handgun suggests that this .38, to the exclusion of all others, was the murder weapon. This is particularly true if the killing bullet can also be matched to this particular .38.

In general, all forms of evidence have class or individual characteristics. Class characteristics are not unique to a particular object but place the particular bit of evidence into a group of objects. Individual characteristics narrow down the evidence to a single, individual source.The type of handgun with which a victim is shot is a class characteristic. For example, if the bullet came from a .38 caliber handgun, every .38 caliber handgun on the planet is the possible murder weapon. However, finding a suspect’s fingerprint (an individual characteristic) on a .38 caliber handgun suggests that this .38, to the exclusion of all others, was the murder weapon. This is particularly true if the killing bullet can also be matched to this particular .38.Alternatively, blood recovered from a crime scene that tests show is type B (a class characteristic) could have come from any of the tens of millions of people who share this blood type. If the suspect has type B blood, he remains a suspect. From there, DNA (an individual characteristic) from the suspect and DNA from the blood evidence are tested to determine conclusively whether they match. If, however, the suspect’s blood is type A, he then is excluded as the source of the blood

7 0
2 years ago
Sarah is creating a project on smartphone use. She wants to apply studies on the effects of computer use to hypothesize about th
natali 33 [55]

Answer: deductive

Explanation:

Deductive method is one of the methods of reasoning, in which the consequences are deducted using general principles. The theorems are deducted from the definitions and postulates. In this previously know facts are also taken into consideration while deriving a conclusion.

According to the given situation, applying the studies on the effects of computer use to hypothesize for the effects of smartphone use involves the use of deductive method of reasoning. As here, previous knowledge is used to deduce a conclusion that is to understand the use of smartphone.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Speech is not protected when it ____________________.
    12·2 answers
  • In the clips you just watched, what similar tactics did the presidents use to fulfill the role of chief legislator? Check all
    10·2 answers
  • True or False: Lobbyists gain access to government officials by donating to campaigns.
    10·2 answers
  • Plz hurry idk how to do this :/
    10·1 answer
  • What are acts committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group?
    6·1 answer
  • 1. A person designated by the court whose knowledge exceeds the knowledge of anyone with a
    7·1 answer
  • COPIED AND PASTED
    6·1 answer
  • How does Levi from aka help better understand the government
    10·2 answers
  • Due within 15 minutes. Please help.
    15·1 answer
  • Introduction, acceptance, buy, arrest, covering of the informant, and after action are common steps of
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!