1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
muminat
3 years ago
15

In the supreme court case loving v virginia a law that banned interracial marriage was declared unconstitutional.

History
2 answers:
nika2105 [10]3 years ago
6 0
A. Ideologies of the justices and B. evolving attitudes.
kari74 [83]3 years ago
4 0

In the Supreme Court case Loving v. Virginia a law that banned interracial marriage was declared unconstitutional. Judicial interpretations changed as a result of change in the ideologies of the justices, and citizen petitions of equality between white and black people.

The case Loving v, Virginia was a judicial case on civil rights, brought before the Supreme Court of the United States, which in its judgment established jurisprudence invalidating the laws that prohibited interracial marriage in the United States.

In the case, Mildred Loving, a black woman, and Richard Loving, a white man, had been sentenced to one year in jail in Virginia for marrying. Their marriage violated the anti-miscegenation laws of the State, the Racial Integrity Act of 1924, which prohibited all marriage between persons classified as "white" with persons classified as "colored". The Supreme Court unanimously ruled that such a ban was unconstitutional, reversing the ruling in Pace v. Alabama (1883) and ending all legal restrictions on marriage based on race in the country.

The ruling caused an increase in interracial marriages in the United States and is commemorated annually every June 12 with the Loving Day.

You might be interested in
Provided suffrage (right to vote) to women
timurjin [86]

Answer:

woman's suffregette

Explanation:

kwksosoowowowowoekekekeowowow

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How is james madison’s plan for “ambition to counteract ambition” reflected in our system of separated powers?
Allushta [10]
The idea of it is the idea of checks and balances. You separate the three powers and make them powerful. If one does something bad, or tries to, they get countered by another branch. The executive and the legislative choose the judicial, the judicial resolves the executive and the legislative, and so on and so forth, it's like a circle.
7 0
3 years ago
What was the most disputed property for the French and Germans?
dexar [7]
B seems most correct
4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did slavery influence Texas to enter the Civil War?
saw5 [17]

Answer:

cause they liked having slaves

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Q.In the selection, how does the bird contribute to the theme?
Komok [63]

Answer: A

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • According to the evolutionary theory the state begins as a
    11·2 answers
  • The most common place for a bill to die is
    8·2 answers
  • Which event happens last in the appeals process??
    9·1 answer
  • The number. of during WWI is the total number of people who were killed, injured, or went missing.
    9·2 answers
  • What did the Lieutenant Governor raise the Indian people’s rent for
    7·1 answer
  • The early cities of Mohenjo-daro and Harappa were loacted______.
    11·2 answers
  • Early in his presidency, jimmy carter gave priority attention to
    9·1 answer
  • consider the information you have learned about the colombian exchange. Which location, new world or old world, influenced the o
    6·1 answer
  • Can someone help me with 5 & 6? it should be easy for some people.
    9·2 answers
  • Could a reign of terror happen here in America?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!