The answer is discouraged by government
<span>the illegal practice of trading on the stock exchange to one's own advantage through having access to confidential information.
</span>
Answer:
No, their economic cost of enrolling in the business program is not the same for both,
Explanation:
The explicit costs of going back to college are the same for Walter and Jesse, e.g. they might be $20,000 per year, or even $30,000 doesn't matter for this analysis. But Walter is currently working as a teacher and that means taht if he decides to go to college, his implicit costs will include the forgone salary as a teacher which is $50,000 per year. Implicit costs are opportunity costs, i.e. additional costs or benefits lost from choosing one activity or investment instead of another alternative.
Since Jesse is not working, whether she goes back to college or not will not affect her income, it will still be $0, but if Walter goes back to college he will lose his salary.
Answer:
Correct option is (a)
Explanation:
Excise tax is an indirect tax which is not imposed on customers directly. Excise tax is imposed on producers or sellers for goods produced and they in turn transfer the burden of tax on customers in the form of higher prices. That is why, it is called indirect tax.
It is usually imposed on those goods such as liquor and tobacco whose consumption the Government needs to decrease. If excise tax is imposed on restaurant meals, then the restaurant will be able to produce and sell less at the same price it was charging earlier. If the restaurant wishes to sell more, then it will have to charge higher price.
A private contractor becouse it is important
