Neoclassical economics places a larger focus on providing extra options and <u>improving living standards, </u><u>which are ultimately decided by long-term progress.</u>
As a result, it focuses on long-term growth rather than fighting recessions.
In actuality, neoclassical economics holds that a product's price is mostly influenced by its manufacturing costs. According to neoclassical economics, the primary factor for client decision-making therefore becomes price.
As a result, letting the neoclassical economists concentrate on prices is not the best way to combat the recession. Long-term economic performance is always emphasized by neoclassical economists.
Note that the neoclassical approach to macroeconomics emphasizes the idea that, over time, the economy tends to recover to its potential GDP and natural unemployment rate.
Learn what John Maynard Keynes would recommend to fight the recession: brainly.com/question/25586856
#SPJ4
Answer:
Gross profit $39,000
Explanation:
X company
Income statement ( parochial)
For the year ended, June 30 20YY
Sales revenue $104,000
Less: cost of goods sold $65,000
Gross profit $39,000
In that case, we do not use Income tax expense, Operating expenses, Deferred revenues, Non-operating revenues because those will be needed when we will calculate the net income.
Answer:
Lease Equipment $150,000
BUY EQUIPMENT$134,700
Differential Effects-$15,300
The company should choose BUY EQUIPMENT which is Alternative 2
Explanation:
Preparation of the differential analysis dated March 15 to determine whether Laredo Corporation should lease (Alternative 1) or purchase (Alternative 2) the equipment
Differential Analysis
Lease (Alt. 1) or Buy (Alt. 2) Equipment
March 15
Lease Equipment (Alternative 1); Buy Equipment
(Alternative 2); Differential Effects (Alternative 2)
Costs:
Purchase price $0 $120,000 $120,000
Freight and installation $0 $1,500 $1,500
Repair and maintenance (6 years) $0 $13,200.$13,200
($2,200*6=$13,200)
Lease (6 years) $150,000 $0 -$150,000
($25,000*6)
Total costs $150,000 $134,700 -$15,300
Based on the above calculation the company should choose BUY EQUIPMENT which is Alternative 2
Answer:
- I think Ben should encourage the Senior Management to call a multidisciplynary meeting and do some research.
Explanation:
<em>I think Ben is right</em>. Even though the statement is technically correct, it may mislead customers.
Customers may interpret the phrase "<em>no sugar added</em>" as if the product did not contain any sugar.
Thus, customers interested in drinking beverages without sugar at all might think they are "safe" consuming the smoothie beverage, when in reallity each <em>smoothie's bottle contains sugar 35 g of naturally occurring sugars from the fruit.</em>
Customers deserve to be certain on what they are buying, thus the labels must be a sincere help for them, and not ambiguos at all.
This is a "gray zone" and an example of what in ethics is called a dilema.
I think the decision should be shared by a wider team and based on some research.
I think Ben should encourage the Senior Management to call a multidisciplynary meeting, where the subject is widely discussed. Also, I would suggest Ben to do some research, look for precedents about labeling in the industry, and try to learn the opinion of the FDA about this sensitive matter.
