Answer:
Cedrick's potential maximum liability = $50
Explanation:
Given:
$250 = a Blueminusray player
$600 = new set of tires
$200 = Cash withdrawal
$40 = interest charges
Find:
Cedrick's potential maximum liability
Computation:
Cedrick's potential maximum liability = Blueminusray player - Cash withdrawal
Cedrick's potential maximum liability = $250 - $200
Cedrick's potential maximum liability = $50
Answer:
He/She has no property subject to execution.
Explanation:
It is description of a person who doesn't have the assets for the creditor to seize when the court order requires the debt repayment. A broke and unemployed person is judgement proof. The debtor having few legally protected assets and income is also judgement proof. Judgment proof is also called the collection proof and is not permanent. The judgement are valid for many years, the creditors continue to collect whatever the judgement allows even after they have won a lawsuit against a delinquent customer.
The risks diagnosed from beyond encounters are inward risks, for example, value danger, plan risk, execution risk, useful gamble, and so forth.
Nevertheless, positive dangers can not be distinguished and connected with dubious economic occasions and are from the place of the mission where there aren't always yet enough records to apprehend what modifications would possibly appear. Such dangers are a) market chance coming from outside contests, mortgage charge changes, credit inaccessibility, unusual trade vacillations, and so forth.
Governance change risks from the corporation's execution on CSR problems, morals, emblem picture, notoriety, and so on. c) legal gamble to abrupt claims, non-compliances, and so on d) Political gamble because of development in authorities strategies, guidelines, change in government itself, and so on.
Learn more about Stakeholders here:-brainly.com/question/15532995
#SPJ4
Answer:
Frank and Carol Bellacera are confused
Explanation:
The fact that the couples are super -cautious in nature is getting them confused concerning what they actually wanted as they were trying to be extra careful.
They initially requested for a comparable sales price for their property towards listing, known as comparative market analysis which Dustin Giles provided. However , they went on to change their request to the actual value that a lender can be used to establish a loan which is appraisal .Dustin could have been able to do the appraisal if only he is an independent licensed appraiser practitioner.
Therefore from the scenario ,it is very obvious that Frank and Carole did not really know what they wanted or probably have not made up their mind concerning their decision on the property.
Answer:
(a) $18,000
(b) $3,600
Explanation:
(a) Profit would be:
= (No. of shares × Undervalued) - (No. of shares × Overvalued)
= (1,800 × $16) - (1,800 × $6)
= $28,800 - $10,800
= $18,000
(b) Only half your order will be filled.
With rationing (and being an uninformed investor) we expect our profits:
= (No. of shares × Undervalued) - (No. of shares × Overvalued)
= (900 × $16) - (1,800 × $6)
= $14,400 - $10,800
= $3,600
