Losing face is a primary danger in a "collectivist" culture
.
A collectivist culture is one that depends on esteeming the requirements of a gathering or a network over the person. Connection, family, and network are critical. Individuals tend to cooperate to make amicability and gathering attachment is to a great degree esteemed. People in a collectivist culture are probably going to esteem what is useful for the entire over what is beneficial for one individual.
Collectivistic cultures accentuate the necessities and objectives of the gathering all in all finished the requirements and wants of every person. In such societies, associations with different individuals from the gathering and the interconnectedness between individuals assume a focal part in every individual's personality. Societies in Asia, Central America, South America, and Africa have a tendency to be more collectivistic.
Skewed understanding involves the degree to which the biases inherent in the discipline’s perspective is reflected, therefore the way an author understands the issue that resulted from the author’s intentional decision or unconscious predisposition to exclude specific information that refers to the issue.
Skewed understanding is the distorted understanding of an issue in a way that it is regarded as inaccurate or misleading.
Answer:
This is an example of <u>deductive</u> reasoning.
Explanation:
There are two types of typical reasoning, deductive and inductive. In this case for Stuart, he likes deductive reasoning due to his affiliation for logical solutions. This increase in cognitive work means he very carefully analyzes and interprets problems thus he 'induces.' He requires an initial statement or something known for him to come to a valid conclusion. Deductive is usally based on theory and inductive on observations.
Answer:
The naturalistic methodological approach is sometimes rejected in the field of psychology on the basis that psychological events possess attributes that do not exist in purely natural events. One of the characteristics of the psychological is its intentionality. Starting from the distinction between the basic psychological processes and the behavioral products that emerge from them, it is proposed that the former constitute a proper field of natural science but that: nevertheless, they lead to the generation of theories capable of explaining intentional behavior.
Psychology is the study of individual behavior, that is, it is the investigation of processes that occur in the individual, such as perception or learning. In psychology, therefore, you should necessarily focus on possibly universal processes
natural science methods and goals are probably not useful for studying people and social behavior; Instead of explaining to people and society, research should aim at understanding human behavior ... In this vision, the most interesting questions are not about the "reality of the world, but about people's interpretations of it.
Intentional behavior, such as contingencies of reinforcement, educational experience or the current social context, we can see that a “causal” approach cannot easily be rejected. For example, we can see that a behavior now occurs because in the past it was followed by certain consequences. However, even recognizing the presence of such causes, the interpretationist researcher will insist that they influence the behavior only to the extent that they have any meaning for the individual and according to the intentions and motives that he harbors (and hence the same "causes" influence different individuals differently). Ultimately, then, the most important factors lie in these meanings, intentions and motives.
In an experiment, the process of random assignment ensures that each participant has an equal chance of being in either the control group or the experimental group.
Random assignment refers to the use of random methods in psychological experiments to equalize the chances of each participant being assigned to a particular group. Participants in the study will be divided into various groups at random, such as an experimental group or a treatment group.
Tossing a coin, picking a name out of a hat, rolling dice, or giving players random numbers are just a few examples of random assignment techniques. Remember that random assignment is distinct from random selection. Random assignment describes how those chosen participants are then assigned to experimental groups, whereas random selection describes how people are picked at random to represent the greater community.
Know more about random assignment here
brainly.com/question/9423006
#SPJ4
