Explanation:
Its because of humans cause they are evil
Violence in the actual world and violence in the media are not universally accepted as being related.
What is violent media ?
Almost from the beginning of television, parents, educators, lawmakers, and mental health specialists have sought to comprehend the effects of the medium, particularly on children. The representation of violence has drawn particular attention, especially in light of psychologist Albert Bandura's research on social learning and children's propensity to emulate what they see in the 1970s.
The Surgeon General's Scientific Advisory Committee on Television and Social Conduct was established in 1969 to examine the effects of violence on viewers' attitudes, values, and behavior as a result of 15 years of "consistently alarming" results about the violent content of children's shows. The ensuing report and a follow-up report from the National Institute of Mental Health in 1982.
Learn more about violent media with the help of given link:-
brainly.com/question/2038726
#SPJ4
Answer:
d. Presidents usually factor in the effects that 1st term political activities may have on their reelction bids as they plan their legislative priorities
Explanation:
In a democratic government, elections are held periodically in order to change elected officials. Sometimes an incumbent president may be seeking reelection or it could be that two (or more) new candidates are contesting to become president.
If its re-election, an incumbent president would most likely compare his first term in office and factor in his performance before planning legislative priorities.
Therefore, the statement about presidential reelection that is MOST accurate is option D
<span>There's not really any pros for propaganda because essentially what you are doing is lying to get someone to believe something. I guess you could say a pro is that gullible people will believe you, but that's an unethical pro. The cons are that it usually causes much controversy in a society where there's not supposed to be a bias in the government. Propaganda in its true form is never a good thing. It is unethical in the sense that it takes advantage of people who are too lazy to do research and quick to believe what someone tells them. One example I like to use is many of these independent "news" websites. On both ends of the political spectrum, left and right, you find websites that have articles so heavily weighed down with that wings propaganda that true news becomes less and less visible. Occupy Democrats is one textbook example of that. Their articles are so left leaning that you read an article and are immediately left with a left leaning impression. Same goes for a lot of right wing websites. I'm not going to say "always" but propaganda 99.9 percent of the time is not good. Instead of people doing their own research to decide their view on something, propaganda </span>tells<span> people what they should think versus the </span><span>asking </span><span>people what they think</span>
