Answer:
She's jumping to conclusions
There are still plenty of other ways to have an accident on the highway
Explanation:
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Family stress theory explains the sporadic stressors that occur to all families, and the reason behind certain family relationships disintegration when members are encountered with a stressful incident.
However, certain family bonds actually adapt and strengthen, depending on the family resources, which could be any or all of family cohesion, adaptability, and emotional support during a time of perceived stress.
Hence, in this case, the "family resources" element of Family stress theory suggests that family-based resources such as cohesion, adaptability, and problem-solving may be important factors in whether families survive or deteriorate when stressors are introduced, is considered TRUE.
Leo is committing a fallacy called a red herring, which is a device in an argument that detracts the opponent from relevant issue. By saying that Scandinavian countries produce less carbon emissions than the US, he's either deliberately or inadvertently distracting Annie away from the fact that whether or not Scandinavian countries produce emissions matter, what matters in this context is that the US will receive less economical benefits from decreasing carbon emissions. By mentioning the state of Scandinavian countries, he pulling her away from the main topic at hand: effects of decrease of carbon emissions on the economy of the US alone.
When a team has meaningful purpose that all members of a team aspire to, it is called vision. Hope this helps!
