Answer:
An example of being socially responsible would be donating money to an organization that works against social injustice, such as the Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation. Instead of using that money for my benefit, like buying something I want, I understand that society as a whole would benefit from that same amount of money, making it a social responsibility to donate.
Explanation:
However, being socially responsible also requires a careful decision on which organization to donate to. Many people have donated to the Black Lives Matter Foundation, which, despite its name, aims to enhance unity with the police department, a goal opposite to the Black Lives Matter movement, which demands the defunding of law enforcement to finance endangered communities.
Answer:
give the work back to the people
Explanation:
Giving the work back to the people tend to be considered as a high risk but high reward approach from the management's perspective.
If this style work, the managers will have a much easier time since they can completely trust the workers to make decisions without relying too much of them. But, if this style does not work, it will be really hard for the managers to connect the accountability when something goes wrong.
The Cold War had many affects on education in the United States. One example is how schools would have air raid drills in case the Soviet Union launched a nuclear bomb, not that hiding under a desk would save you anyway. Another way is all the anti-Russian propaganda produced and distributed to young students.
Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/1328884#readmore
Answer: by making a joint statement against Spain
Explanation:
Answer:
a) Malthus ignored other factors like technological change.
Explanation:
Thomas Malthus (1766-1834) was an English cleric and a scholar, most known for his demographics theory. He is an author of <em>An Essay on the Principle of Population</em>, where he observed that increasing production of food resulted in improved well-being of the population, but this was temporary because it led to a population growth. Larger population led to the restoration of original production per capita.
He was mainly wrong because he did not account for improvement in technology of production. Development and widespread use of technology meant that it is not needed to use the same amount of energy to produce goods. Production increased much faster than the increase of population, which resulted in a failure of his theory.
