Answer:
b. operational definition
Explanation:
Operational definition is the expression of procedure used to define the nature of an event or situation especially used during data collection. In this question, the sentence subject used is 'the intensity of the electrical shock the students are to receive'. Which mean it is asking specifically on the subject of the intensity of the electrical shock.
Option A, hypothetical construct is not it since hypothetical construct is a variable which could be explained but hardly observed. In this case, hypothetical construct is more suitable to the degree of pain (extremely painful, mild shock and other)
Option C, mediating definition is the mediator variable between a dependent and an independent variables; in this case is not applicable
While Option D, conceptual definition give the definition of a certain concept. For example the definition of concept of pain.
Therefore the best answer for this is B, operational definition since it focus on how to measure the intensity of the electrical shock
I think it is D
Hope this help you
Answer:so they can have rights with different people and not just have the same people over again
Explanation:
Answer:
In Schenck v. United States, the Supreme Court <u><em>ruled that bans on dangerous speech were constitutional.</em></u>
Explanation:
In the 1919 Supreme Court case of Schenck v. the United States, the court deemed the actions of Charles Schenck and Elizabeth Baer as unconstitutional. It deemed them criminals for trying to obstruct the government's drafting of men for war and that it is an act against the security of the nation.
This case revolves around the claim that the obstruction of Schenck and Baer's free speech was unconstitutional and they have the right to express their opinions. But the court insisted that since the leaflets they distributed were against national security, the First Amendment doesn't apply to them.
Thus, the correct answer is the second option.
The devil's advocacy decision-making technique is where an individual in the group is allowed to become the critic in the proposed decision
Explanation:
This decision technique helps prevent groupthink and increases the chance of a high-quality decision. It also helps prevent companies from making expensive, risky decisions.
