The answer for this question is b
Answer:
The Court ruled in Schenck v. United States (1919) that speech creating a “clear and present danger” is not protected under the First Amendment. This decision shows how the Supreme Court's interpretation of the First Amendment sometimes sacrifices individual freedoms in order to preserve social order. In Schenck v.
Explanation:
Answer:
Retribution
Explanation:
Retribution is the act of taking revenge. It is harming someone in pay back for something harmful that they have done. The mother of the murdered child want some form of revenge because she believes her child was killed by someone who can never have remorse for what was done to her child . She feels retribution is the best form of punishment for what wasndonr to her child.
Answer: flavors of ice cream
Explanation: Subjectivism theory sees values of what is morally right or wrong like the "flavors of ice cream" i.e values of what is right or wrong is just a matter of what one personally prefers.
This theory holds that there is nothing like objective moral truth and and the only standard of judgement should be that of individuals rather than communal i.e the standard of judgement should be the individual moral conscience.
I would think its the curves demand
