Substantive disagreement may never be resolved because it leads to clashes of opinions.
A disagreement or argument is said to be substantial if it centers on the presentation of divergent viewpoints regarding the truth or the adherence to opposing ideals.
There must be a means to distinguish substantive disagreement (SD) from conceptual disagreement if legal concepts can be the subject of SD. Arguments that persons debating a certain philosophical problem are only having a linguistic argument are one approach to reject the substantiveness of the issue. For instance, it has been argued that the seeming conflict over the mind/brain identity thesis is only a word one and that there is no real controversy over whether or not mental traits are the same as neurological ones.
To know more about Substantive disagreement refer to:
brainly.com/question/28085499
#SPJ1
Answer:
This best illustrates the importance of "<u>biological predispositions</u>" in associative learning.
Explanation:
Biological predisposition in humans means that there are internal characteristics humans possess that increase their chances of having certain conditions.
The taste aversion (or dislike) someone develops after eating tainted food and falling ill is as a result of <em>associating the stimuli (the taste of the bad food) with the response (falling ill)</em>.
By associating the stimuli with the response, the body learns to stay away from such food in future, to avoid falling ill again.
This indicates that biological predispositions are more important in associative learning than external stimuli (such as; music or the sight of the restaurant).
Answer: For the allowance of her husband with her
Explanation:
