Answer:
C.product placement.
Explanation:
This is a paid product message aimed at influencing movie (or television) audiences via the planned and unobtrusive entry of a branded product into a movie or television program.
Answer:
Explanation:
The journal entry to record the given transaction is shown below:
Cash A/c Dr XXXXX
To Common stock A/c XXXXX
(Being the issuance of the common stock is recorded)
The accounting equation is
Total Assets = Total liabilities + Stockholder equity
Cash Increased = No effect + Increased
Therefore, the cash account and the common stock is increased.
Sherif’s (1966) classic Robbers Cave study of boys at summer camp finds the relationship between the two groups of boys immediately deteriorated when the event began.
In the 1940s and 1950s, social psychologist Muzafer Sherif and his associates conducted a number of investigations, including the Robbers Cave experiment. Sherif investigated the interactions between male groups at summer camps and a competitor group with the hypothesis that "when two groups have competing purposes... their members would become antagonistic to one other even when the groups are constituted of normal well-adjusted individuals at a summer camp " The Robbers Cave study found the incident swiftly escalated once the parties started throwing jabs. The Sherif discovered that the summer camps' surveys, in which they were asked to score their own team and the opposing team on good and bad attributes, contained questions about group animosity.
Learn more about Sherif here:
brainly.com/question/14407858
#SPJ9
Answer:
A. Take regular EBS snapshots .
Explanation:
-
is incorrect. It lacks durability of EBS volumes.
-
is incorrect. ECT Instance stores are not durable.
-
is incorrect. Mirroring across EBS volumes is pargely inefficient.
-Since EBS snapshots only saves snapshots of the most recent device changes, a great deal of time and memory is saved. Also, only data unique to any particular snapshot is removed in cases of deletion.
Answer:
a. No, because Shelby made a mistake about the dog's value, not a mistake about a material fact.
Explanation:
Peggy made an offer to sell the dog for $800, they didn't discuss the dog's ancestry and Shelby wrongly assumed the dog was from champion lines and agreed to buy the dog for $800.
Based on further investigations, she discovered the dog was worth just $200.
She cannot rescind the contract because she wrongly assumed the dog's value not an error about à material fact. Peggy sold the dog at her own rates and Shelby bought the dog while wrongly assuming the value, so she cannot cancel the contract based on that.
