Explanation:
natural resources are benefit peoples with naturally but economic sources exonomically
Answer:
Gustatory hallucination.
Explanation:This is a type in which the person feels like they have something in their mouth that taste a certain way so they start acting like they are eating that particular thing cause in their mind it feels like they are .
I believe the answer is: Sigmund freud
The talking cure was the term that Sigmund Freud used to describe the psychoanalysis that conducted by having conversation with the patient in order to observe their intonation and nonverbal language and determine the cause of their psychological disorder.<span />
Answer:
Context-dependent memory
Explanation:
Context-dependent memory is a phenomenon in which a memory comeback is most efficient at certain environment or surroundings which helps in retrieving some memories which is formed in certain context.
In the context, Brenda learnt about the state dependent memory and because of that she was little worried when she came to know that one of the exam was going to held at a different lecture hall other than the normal class.
She was worried because according to the context dependent memory, memory retrieval is effective in the same surrounding environment. The environment cues provides for the retrieval of certain memories properly.
Answer:
What follows is a bill of indictment. Several of these items end up in the Bill of Rights. Others are addressed by the form of the government established—first by the Articles of Confederation, and ultimately by the Constitution.
The assumption of natural rights expressed in the Declaration of Independence can be summed up by the following proposition: “First comes rights, then comes government.” According to this view: (1) the rights of individuals do not originate with any government, but preexist its formation; (2) the protection of these rights is the first duty of government; and (3) even after government is formed, these rights provide a standard by which its performance is measured and, in extreme cases, its systemic failure to protect rights—or its systematic violation of rights—can justify its alteration or abolition; (4) at least some of these rights are so fundamental that they are “inalienable,” meaning they are so intimately connected to one’s nature as a human being that they cannot be transferred to another even if one consents to do so. This is powerful stuff.
At the Founding, these ideas were considered so true as to be self-evident. However, today the idea of natural rights is obscure and controversial. Oftentimes, when the idea comes up, it is deemed to be archaic. Moreover, the discussion by many of natural rights, as reflected in the Declaration’s claim that such rights “are endowed by their Creator,” leads many to characterize natural rights as religiously based rather than secular. As I explain in The Structure of Liberty: Justice and the Rule of Law, I believe his is a mistake.
