1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kumpel [21]
3 years ago
7

Fiona, a college student, has agreed to participate in a psychology study. Before she begins, she reads a statement written by t

he researcher explaining the purpose of the research and the potential risks of participation. It also states that Fiona is free to withdraw from the research at any time. In providing Fiona with this statement, the researcher has followed the ethical guidelines of _____ for participants.
Social Studies
1 answer:
vlabodo [156]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

informed consent                                                  

Explanation:

Informed consent: The term informed consent represents one of the establishing principles that is being used in research ethics. It encompasses the procedure that involves the research participants to enter or take part in particular research voluntarily or freely by gaining full information related to the research and it shows the cause of taking part in the research and therefore the participants give consent before entering the research.

Principles:

1. Voluntary nature of the participant's decision.

2. Capability of the participants to make a decision.

3. Disclosure of information.

4. Complete explanation related to the research including potential risks.

You might be interested in
According to developmental psychologist K. Warner Schaie, the stage where the major concerns of middle-aged adults relate to the
Vera_Pavlovna [14]

Answer:Achieving Stage

Explanation:achieving stage is the point reached by young adults in which intelligence is applied to specific situations involving the attainment of long-term goals regarding careers, family, and societal contributions.

Achieving stage occupies the early adulthood of a person. During this period, a person applies his/her intelligence and accumulated knowledge to attain career and family goals

6 0
3 years ago
If you are writing a critique that claims an argument is based on sheltered or narrow logic that cannot hold up to real-world ex
tia_tia [17]

Answer:

that is calm and respectful while still criticizing the writer's inability to understand a wider perspective.                        

Explanation:

n simple words, one has to remain calm and civilized in writing some formal agreement or any other such document. The writer has to keep in mind that the motive of the reply or the message is not to insult the other party but to make sure the understanding of the messages between the two parties must be established.

Thus, even if one feel dissatisfied or angry from someone while writing some formal critique he or she should not use aggressive language.

4 0
3 years ago
Suppose you have an argument that is weak and uncogent. given this information, what do you know about the conclusion of this ar
AfilCa [17]

If you have an argument that is weak and uncogent, the conclusion may be either true or false.

An argument is a collection of two or more statements, one of which is supported by another. A conclusion is a proposition supported and a premise is a proposition supporting the conclusion. The purpose of an argument is to build a conclusion based on the premises or the evidence provided by the premises.

An inductive argument is one that claims that the conclusion follows with some degree of probability. In other words, premises make the conclusion more likely to be true, and premises true make the conclusion less likely to be false. Inductive arguments are powerful when given that the premises are true, the conclusion is unlikely to be false.

An inductive argument is weak when the conclusion is likely false given the premises are true. A strong argument is cogent if the premise is correct. A strong argument is uncogent if at least one of its premises is wrong.

Know more about uncogent argument here

brainly.com/question/13445406

#SPJ4

8 0
2 years ago
If a state law is in conflict with a national law, a state judge must?
Vladimir [108]

The Supremacy Clause is a clause within Article VI of the U.S. Constitution which dictates that federal law is the "supreme law of the land." ... Under the doctrine of preemption, which is based on the Supremacy Clause, federal law preempts state law, even when the laws conflict.


7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Do you think we're too vigilant to speak truthfully?
zzz [600]
Um let me think about it umm
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Political parties influence public policy because they - try to get their members elected whom they expect to vote along the par
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not a result of language convergence?
    6·2 answers
  • A state south of New York
    9·2 answers
  • Empires and nation-states are types of
    13·1 answer
  • In eight states, if a candidate does not receive a majority in the primary election, ___
    12·1 answer
  • If you are saving for a new fridge that costs $2,000 and the economy experiences
    12·1 answer
  • Type the term that best completes the sentence. the internet, by enabling us to obtain everything from music to vintage toys wit
    8·1 answer
  • What else have you learned about Athens that might make people think of it as a great city?
    10·2 answers
  • An immediate effect of the voyage of Vasco de Gama was the
    8·1 answer
  • What are some actions that an unlimited government might take to maintain its authority to lead a nation?
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!