2.85 - 6.2 divided by 2(2 exponent)
1 answer:
You might be interested in
Answer:
<h2>Kelly is wrong, with this congruent parts, we can conclude that triangles are congruent.</h2>Step-by-step explanation:
To demonstrate congruent triangles, we need to use the proper postulates. There are at least 5 postulates we can use.
- Angle-Angle-Side Theorem (AAS theorem).
- Hypotenuse-Leg Theorem (HL theorem).
- Side-Side-Side Postulate (SSS postulate).
- Angle-Side-Angle Postulate (ASA postulate).
- Side-Angle-Side Postulate (SAS postulate).
In this case, Kelly SAS postulate, because the corresponding sides-angles-sides are congruent, i.e., KL ≅ MN and LM ≅ KN, also, all corresponding angles are congruent.
So, as you can see, only using SAS postulate, the congruency can be demonstrated. (Refer to the image attached to see an example of SAS postulate)
Answer:
And we can find this probability with the complement rule:
Step-by-step explanation:
For this case we define the random variable X ="driving distance for the top 100 golfers on the PGA tour" and we know that:
And for this case the probability density function is given by:
And the cumulative distribution function is given by:
And we want to find this probability:
And we can find this probability with the complement rule: