Answer:
The upshot is that while the Puritans did believe in witchcraft and evil spirits, they rarely associated any real person with those beliefs, and even more rarely persecuted people as witches. And they put a lot more stock generally in real-world problems and solutions than spectral ones.
Corporations became the most important form of business organization in the late 19th century because their industries needed large amounts of capital.
The first American businesses were created in the 1790s and quickly rose to prominence in the economy of the fledgling country. Even while there were businesses in early 19th-century Europe, especially in Great Britain and the Netherlands, no nation adopted corporate growth as quickly as the United States.
In the initial years following the American Revolution, there were small financial organizations.
Corporations may raise capital from a variety of sources, offering a crucial channel for both producers and savers. In the early years, voting rights were significantly less guaranteed due to procedures for "graduating" certain stockholders, but companies nevertheless represented a novel form of investment.
To learn more about Corporations refer to:
brainly.com/question/28097453
#SPJ4
I'd say probably not. There's no room for any companies that are not owned by or allowed by the government. Mercantilists were interested mostly in exploiting peoples for natural resources. So no, it's not particularly fair to businesses or indigenous populations
Answer:
Edward VI
Explanation:
Edward became king at the age of nine, when his father died in January 1547. His father had arranged that a council of regency should rule on his behalf, but Edward's uncle, Edward Seymour, Duke of Somerset, took power and established himself as protector.
Aung San Suu Kyi is considered to be a very brave human being because <u>she </u><u>stood </u><u>against the </u><u>military dictatorship </u><u>of </u><u>Myanmar</u><u>. </u>
<h3>Aung San Suu Kyi </h3>
- Opposed the military government of Myanmar.
- Became part of the civilian government of Myanmar.
Aung San Suu Kyi braved arrest, detention, and death threats from the military to keep struggling against them all the while calling for nonviolent protests.
In conclusion, Aung San Suu Kyi can be said to be very courageous because she refused to back down and yet never called for violence.
Find out more on Aung San Suu Kyi at brainly.com/question/1253510.
