Answer: (A) 6.6 sec (B) 6.89 sec
<u>Step-by-step explanation:</u>
y = -16t² + 1700
1000 = -16t² + 1700
<u>-1700</u> <u> -1700 </u>
-700 = -16t²
<u> ÷-16 </u> <u>÷-16 </u>
43.75 = t²
√43.75 = √t²
6.6 = t
***********************************
y = -16t² + 1700
940 = -16t² + 1700
<u>-1700</u> <u> -1700 </u>
-760 = -16t²
<u> ÷-16 </u> <u>÷-16 </u>
47.5 = t²
√47.5 = √t²
6.89 = t
Answer:
THIS IS HARD
Step-by-step explanation:
The base case is the claim that

which reduces to

which is true.
Assume that the inequality holds for <em>n</em> = <em>k </em>; that

We want to show if this is true, then the equality also holds for <em>n</em> = <em>k</em> + 1 ; that

By the induction hypothesis,

Now compare this to the upper bound we seek:

because

in turn because
