Answer:
a. The Equal Protection Clause is a clause from the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The clause provides that "nor shall any State [...] deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws".
Its purpose is to apply substantially more constitutional restrictions against the states than had applied before the Civil War. Hence, in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), Supreme Court held that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause while bodies doing redistricting must be conscious of race to the extent that they must ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act.
While in the case of Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 (2001), Supreme Court held that the State violated the Equal Protection Clause in drawing the 1997 boundaries was based on clearly erroneous findings.
b. In the case of Easley v. Cromartie, an appeal from the decision given in hunt v. Cromartie was filed in the supreme court of the United States by Easley. In hunt v. Cromartie, the court held that the legislature of North Carolina did not use the factor of race while drawing the boundaries in the twelfth congressional district,1992. It was held by the court that the legislature did not violate the equal protection clause of the constitution and no evidence to prove that legislature set its boundaries on a racial basis rather than a political basis.
In Easley v Cromartie the appeal was that drawing the boundaries for voting violated the equal protection clause of the constitution. The supreme court of the United States held that the decision of the district court is erroneous because it actually relied upon racial factors and this is not in the interest of the state.
In Shaw v. Reno the court concluded that the plan of North Carolina tried to segregate the voters on the basis of race.
Answer:
<em>The battle began because the Persian Army wanted to defeat the Greek city-states that supported the uprisings in Ionia, part of modern-day Turkey, against the Persian Empire</em>
Note:
Have a nice day :)
Answer:
A. heredity has minimal effects on one's personality
Explanation:
In the twin studies, researchers separate two twins and put them in different environment to grow. The purpose of this study is two find out whether they will grow up with different personalities.
As it turned out, the twins that separated and grew up in different environment still grow up with similar personalities. From this, researchers made the conclusion that heredity is actually has a huge effects of one personality (since twins born with identical genetics).
Companies like Walmart that assert a "more for less" strategy are using value-based pricing.
What is value-based pricing?
- Value-based pricing is a method of setting prices that is mostly based on how much a consumer thinks a product or service is worth.
- Value pricing is which means that businesses set their prices in accordance with what consumers think a product is worth.
- Value-based pricing differs from "cost-plus" pricing, which computes prices after taking manufacturing costs into account.
- Companies that provide distinctive or highly desirable products or services are better positioned to benefit from the value pricing model than those that sell primarily commoditized goods.
- The value-based pricing theory primarily applies in marketplaces where owning a product improves a customer's self-image or enables unmatched life experiences.
To learn more about Value-based pricing refer to:
brainly.com/question/17438199
#SPJ4
