Boundaries that disregarded ethnic and religious differences most contributed to an absence of national identity in newly independent countries.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The powers that granted independence to the countries they ruled for long periods, also usually interfered in demarcating the boundaries of the regions before granting independence.
This demarcation of boundaries was not always done on the basis of ethnic and religious differences in the region. Thus, it often made the newly independent countries experience a lack of national identity among the people of the countries.
Answer:
Ukraine. Gaza. Syria. Yemen. Pakistan. If it feels like the United States is always at war somewhere, that's because it is. Not just Iraq and Afghanistan - the two wars we all know about. And, granted, we're not only talking boots on the ground. It's our money, our weapons and - more often in recent weeks - our Secretary of State, engaged in high-stakes diplomacy to uneven results. At his last count, investigative journalist Kevin Gosztola put the U.S. war count at 74. These are mostly unannounced and undeclared wars against enemies that have different aspirations, strategies and ideologies.
Why? The official line varies. Some conflict engagement is, we're told, about nation-building (Iraq and Afghanistan.) Other operations are to remove a despotic ruler (Syria, Libya.) Some engagement is designed to pick off a terror group/groups (Oman, Pakistan, Yemen) and/or to spread "true" democracy (Iraq and Afghanistan, again.) There are wars we engage in to free people from a cycle of fear (Central African Republic) to stem the flow of hundreds-year-old bloodletting (Israel/Palestine) and to keep old foes in check (Ukraine/Russia).
Answer:
A. communication is collaborative
Explanation:
'Communication is collaborative' is the concept which conveys that in order for communication to occur efficiently , all the parties involved need to understand the topic of communication and contribute their own knowledge/topic during the process.
In the example above,
The student directly know what the teacher is thinking without needing to say it. This indicates that both the teacher and the students understood the topic of their conversation (in this context, it will be the student called Ernesto). If that conversation continue, the student will most likely contribute his knowledge regarding Ernesto's likelihood.
Answer:
For the Jeffersonian Republicans, it was necessary to bring some different ideas to their mind after 1801, they accepted some federalist ideas due to the fact that after the government of Jefferson and Madison it was hard to distinguish between the ideas of the two parties
Explanation:
For the Jeffersonian Republicans, it was necessary to bring some different ideas to their mind after 1801, they accepted some federalist ideas due to the fact that after the government of Jefferson and Madison it was hard to distinguish between the ideas of the two parties, since they had to share a lot of concepts for the constitution's construction. Jefferson for example, adopted some federalist conceptions when he bought some land that he was offered for the benefit of the country. He did so, even though the constitution was not strictly established or allowed for the purchase of land by the president.
On the other hand, at the same time the federalists adopted a strict constructionist position, arguing that the purchase of land by the president was not allowed by the constitution.
Also Madison, who was considered a federalist, acted according to republicans ideas when he refused to sign a congress project that proposed to destinate some money for the construction of roads, he said that idea was against the constitution and he had to reject it.
That is why, at that moment of politics it was hard to distinguish the ideas of the two parties that had been before so strict, but at that moment everything changed.
Because no time period is specified, I am going to go with carefully.
