The Fourth Amendment states that "the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable UNREASONABLE SEARCHES AND SEIZURES, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon PROBABLE CAUSE."
Answer:
hearsay
Explanation:
According to my research on federal law investigations, I can say that based on the information provided within the question most federal courts assume that the records contain hearsay. This term means that the evidence contains unofficial information acquired from another and not part someone's direct knowledge. This is usually inadmissible in court unless proven that it was obtained legally.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
The correct interpretation of this case is that antibiotic A is the only one that effectively fights the patient's bacteria.
<h3>How to interpret the results?</h3>
To interpret the results of this case, we must take into account the manifestations that occur with respect to the antibiotic samples A, B, C and D and their reaction with the bacteria in the patient's wound.
According to the above, it can be inferred that antibiotic A eliminated the bacteria, while the other three antibiotics allowed the proliferation of bacteria.
Learn more about antibiotics in: brainly.com/question/10868637
#SPJ1
"The need to think through a possible sequence of decisions" would make decision trees an especially attractive decision-making tool.
Answer: Option B
<u>Explanation:</u>
The decision tree is an especially attractive decision-making tool which is used to make decisions by coming up with possible sequences and outcomes. This is a way of thinking, and assuming the possible decision sequences and the outcomes if a particular decision is being made. It is called a decision tree due to its branches which stretches like a tree. It is used to determine the possible outcomes in different situations.
