Since Intel has a history of effectively transforming
R&D investment into income, the pro-forma version of the ration seems to be
of more significant. A company starting, for instance, would be unalike: its
track record would be much poorer and probabilities are that the criteria set
in place would not be as rough as Intel’s. Therefore, it appears that the significance
hinge on the kind of business: if future benefit is more of a doubt, then
R&D should be expensed. The contradictory is true if benefit is almost certain.
Intel also has the advantage of being very vibrant with its R&D objectives
and having exact, measurable standards. They note obviously what the funds are apportioned
to and what the end outcomes should be of the growth.
The answer is Wireless networks
Answer:
Not to leave previous job.
Explanation:
- First of all, the question is that what he will lose after leaving the job?
- His earning per year is equal at both sides, still what's the opportunity cost for him?
<em>The answer is simple,</em> he may earn equal but if looked at it in a bigger picture he is losing 401k retirement plan and It is his opportunity cost. He may regret this after leaving the job.
What is the change due if a $5 bill is tendered for a charge of $4.21?
A.0.79
