RULE 1.7 CONFLICT OF INTEREST: CURRENT CLIENTS
(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), a lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation involves a concurrent conflict of interest. A concurrent conflict of interest exists if:
(1) the representation of one client will be directly adverse to another client; or
(2) the representation of one or more clients may be materially limited by the lawyer's responsibilities to another client, a former client, or a third person, or by a personal interest of the lawyer.
(b) Notwithstanding the existence of a concurrent conflict of interest under paragraph (a), a lawyer may represent a client if:
(1) the lawyer reasonably believes that the lawyer will be able to provide competent and diligent representation to each affected client;
(2) the representation is not prohibited by law;
(3) the representation does not involve the assertion of a claim by one client against another client represented by the lawyer in the same litigation or other proceeding before a tribunal; and
(4) each affected client gives informed consent, confirmed in writing.
Answer:
d. fixed costs
Explanation:
The fixed cost is the cost which does not change if there is a change in the level of production i.e if the production level is increased or decreased it the fixed cost would remain the same as it is previous before
Therefore according to the given situation, since the fixed does not vary with the amount of firm output
Hence, option d is correct
% return would be (total profit / total invested) * 100 so
( 100 / 1000 ) * 100 = 10%
That sounds about right for accounting anyway
Answer:
$16,700
Explanation:
The computation of the ending balance in the allowance for doubtful account is shown below:
= Unadjusted credit balance + Net credit sales × estimated bad debt percentage
= $4,100 + $210,000 × 6%
= $4,100 + $12,600
= $16,700
We simply added the unadjsuted credit balance and estimated amount after considered the estimated bad debt percentage
