(Leaders) questions silo thinking or narrow thinking in organizations
I believe it’s false
I’m sorry if I’m wrong
Answer:
It should be greater than $36
Explanation:
The opportunity cost of working is the amount of money sacrificed or could have earned if the individual was not working. In this case, Claire has decided to go with her friend which means that the opportunity cost of not working is less than the benefits receives from going out. Because she is not working it means that the opportunity cost of working is more than 36 dollars, which is the income she could have earned in 3 hours.
You should prioritize your first customer since they are entitled with your full attention being the one who availed your service first. You can ask the second customer if she can wait. But if the second customer would be so persistent, you can ask permission from the first customer if she is not in a hurry and that you would entertain the second customer first.
In the given scenario, Rembrandt Cosmetics accomplished its substitution primarily through strategic planning of equivalence.
<h3>What is strategic planning?</h3>
When the differences between two different strategic plans are identical, with other things being constant, such a situation is called as a strategic planning of equivalence.
Hence, strategic planning holds true regarding the given situation.
Learn more about strategic planning here:
brainly.com/question/16699515
#SPJ1
