Is their answers to choose from?
and i think it might be aribic
Answer:
In this scenario, Greg's actions exemplify social loafing.
Explanation:
Greg's action are exemplifying the term social loafing. In social psychology, social loafing is used to refer to individuals who, when working in groups, exert less effort. It offers an explanation as to why some groups can be inefficient. There are people who present this tendency to not work hard when they know others are working. They are less effective and productive when working in a group than they are when working by themselves and when they are responsible for their own results and productivity.
Answer:
According to the public interest model, government tries to enact laws, regulations, and policies that benefit the public. The private interest (or public choice) model, by contrast, suggests that government officials enact laws that are in their own private interest.
Please mark as brainliest
<span>Michael is most likely to experience "</span>role conflict".
A role conflict refers to a situation when someone has to perform to roles in any capacity which affect each other, for example if there is an employer who has to fire one of his employee who also is a close friend that will put the employer in the situation of the role conflict. In the above case Michael experience role conflict as a Church member and as an employee.
An amendment takes an act of two-thirds of Congress and
ratification by three-fourths of the states. The changes in the amendment could
be proposed either in Congress or states. The proposal must have 2/3 of both
houses in congress agreeing to the amendment. Meanwhile, the state must as well
have 2/3 of the state legislatures to propose the amendment. Regardless of
whoever proposed the amendment, it must be ratified by ¾ of the states.
