Answer:
c. as a deduction from Stockholders’ Equity
Explanation:
The treatment of the treasury stock in the balance sheet is that it is deducted from the stockholder equity as it shows the buy back position of the common stock
The other things i.e retained earnings, additional paid in capital is to be added as it increased the balance of the stockholder equity
Therefore in the given case, the option C is correct
Answer:
$2,950
Explanation:
assuming that year 2000 is the base year:
real GDP for 2003 = (bikini price 2000 x bikini quantity 2003) + (speedos price 2000 x speedos quantity 2003) = ($75 x 30) + ($50 x 14) = $2,950
base year's prices become the real prices of the economy, and any change in real GDP is given by changes in output
Answer: Options-based planning
Explanation:
The Option based planning is one of the concept that helps in maintain the flexibility of the various types of plans for making the various types of investments.
The main purpose of the option based planning is that it helps in maintaining the slack resources are are specifically used in the for of extra resource for the purpose of adapting the various types of changes and also the problems.
According to the given question, the Douclamp is one of the type of manufacturing company that basically making small level of investments on the iron ore plant.
Therefore, Douclamp is using the options based planning based on the given scenario.
Answer:
The answer is letter "C": Producer surplus and consumer surplus will increase because the market becomes more efficient.
Explanation:
Named after English economist Arthur C. Pigou (1877-1959), the Pigovian Tax or corrective tax is a fine imposed against taxpayers for being part of activities that generate negative side effects. According to Pigou, these externalities play a negative role in the market to reach equilibrium.
It is true that the corrective tax encourages market efficiency but it doesn't imply the tax will lead to producer or consumer surplus, since those are actually influenced by basic supply and demand laws, making option "C" a false statement.
Answer:
The total direct materials cost variance is $3,790 favorable
Explanation:
The computation of the total direct materials cost variance is shown below:
Total direct materials cost variance = Actual cost - standard cost
where,
Actual cost is $267,790
And, the standard cost = Actual finished units produced × Direct materials standard
= 22,000 × $12
= $264,000
Now put these values to the above formula
So, the value would equal to
= $267,790 - $264,000
= $3,790 favorable
