The correct statement is," Bonds benefited the citizens who purchased them in a way that the government repaid the bond purchasers with interest." The correct option is D.
Bonds are such securities issued by the government or any other body to procure or raise funds, and interest is payable on them at a predetermined fixed interest rate.
<h3>Bond instruments </h3>
- Bonds are an instrument issued by a borrower to the public who subscribe to them as a token of proof that the borrower has raised such amount from the investor, payable at a fixed time period.
- Bonds generally are beneficial as they are comparatively secured investments than the equities and debts and give more interest than any bank deposits or saving accounts.
- Bonds may be issued by a Government or any other corporate body to raise funds for a specific purpose, which is payable at a fixed rate of interest predetermined at the time of issue of such securities.
Hence, the correct option is D that the government benefits the purchaser of bonds in the way of repaying such bonds with interests to its subscribers.
To know more about bond instruments, click the link below
brainly.com/question/4577522
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
i said yes jus put yes oml
Answer:
The causes of the war were a result of both Roman and Carthaginian actions. Both nations took decisive actions that forced them towards the war.
Explanation:
The fault for the beginning of the Second Punic War can not be placed on a single nation. The causes of the war were a result of both Roman and Carthaginian actions. Both nations took decisive actions that forced them towards the war. Although Rome’s actions were not directly offensive, they set up a path for Carthaginians with very few options.
Answer:
I'm pretty sure its social order (A)
Explanation:
Hope this helps you!
Have a good day!
REMEMBER: You are AWESOME!
Big Stick policy, in American history, policy popularized and named by Theodore Roosevelt that asserted U.S. domination when such dominance was considered the moral imperative.
Roosevelt used this phrase to explain his relations with domestic political leaders and his approach to such issues as the regulation of monopolies and the demands of trade unions.