Answer/Explanation:
<h3>Incomplete dominance</h3>
In incomplete dominance, one allele is not entirely dominant over the other, so heterozygotes (organisms with two different alleles for the gene) show an intermediate or blended phenotype.
For example, consider flower colour.
- If the allele for red flowers (R) was dominant over the allele for white flowers (r), then there are three possible genotypes (RR, Rr, and rr) and two possible phenotypes. (Red (RR and Rr) and white (rr)).
- However, if the allele for red flowers (R) was incompletely dominant over the allele for white flowers (r), then there are three possible genotypes (RR, Rr, rr), and three possible phenotypes (red (RR), white (rr), and pink (Rr))
<h3>Co-dominance</h3>
In incomplete dominance, two alleles are both expressed, one is not dominant over the other. Therefore, heterozygotes (organisms with two different alleles for the gene) express both traits.
For example, consider flower patterns.
- If the allele for spots (F) was dominant over the allele for stripes (f), then there are three possible genotypes (FF, Ff, and ff) and two possible phenotypes. (Spots (Ff and ff) and stripes (ff)).
- However, if the allele for spots (F) was co-dominant to the allele for stripes (f), then there are three possible genotypes (FF, Ff, ff), and three possible phenotypes (spots (FF), stripes (ff), and spots and stripes (Ff))
Secondary structure of protein.
in seconday structure, the polypeptide chain is spirally arranged in linear form.
Teriary structure of protein
In tertiary structure the polypeptide chain is arranged in three dimension.
Quaternary structure of protein
In this structure more than one polypeptide chain are arranged in three dimension forming a globular shape.
Answer:
- False
- True
- True
- False
- False
- True
Explanation:
A hypothesis is a supposition draw from data to carry an investigation or an argumentation.
1. The onion cells I looked at have a nucleus. False, even though the statement is true, is not a hypothesis because is not a supposition, it is rather an observation.
2. All onion cells have a nucleus. True, it is s a <u>valid hypothesis</u> because after the observation of 10 cells you draw a conclusion or supposition and affirm that all onion cells have a nucleus.
3. All cells have a nucleus. True, it is a<u> valid hypothesis</u> it contains a supposition derived from data observation
4. Some cells have a nucleus. False, the hypothesis is not valid because all of the observed cells contained nucleus not only some of them.
5. Only onion cells have a nucleus. False, after the observation of the different type of cells you see that they all had nucleus.
6. If I look at 10 skin cells from my hand, each one will have a nucleus. True, after the observation of different cells you can infer that if you look at your skin cells, they will have a nucleus.
Answer:
c. none of the subjects to show signs and symptoms of a cholesterol deficiency during the entire study.
Explanation:
this is because the blood cholesterol is from two sources. Nearly 80% of the cholesterol the body needs are made by the liver and intestine.certain small amounts are also produced in the adrenal glands and the reproductive organs.The remaining fragment amounts comes from the diets.
Therefore even if these subjects were fed with diet without cholesterol, it will not have any significant effects on the body cholesterol composition. Therefore no symptoms of its deficiency will be observed.
Generally it biosynthesis is regulated by the amount of cholesterol present in the blood.
The hole is a separate phenomenon because it correlates something other than global warming. it doesn’t focus on global warming but more on specific areas.
