Answer:
The main finding of the Stanford prison experiment is that social roles are powerful determinants of human behavior.
Explanation:
The Stanford prison experiment aimed to study life in captivity. It tried to emulate real world cirumstances of prison life; students were divided into playing the role of guards or the role of prisoners. After only a few days of the experiment, students' behavior began to ressemble the role that they were playing: the guards used more physical punishments, and the prisoners began to provoke riots.
The main finding was that social roles are powerful determinants of human behavior because, inspite of knowing that the role they were playing was randomly assigned it ilustrated their obedience when provided with an institutional support.
I think it’s (D) I could be wrong
The intellectual trait that is the opposite of intellectual empathy is:
b. intellectual narrow-mindedness.
<h3 /><h3>What is intellectual Empathy?</h3>
Intellectual empathy refers to the ability of a person to sense the needs of a fellow and render help to them. A person who has intellectual empathy has a broad mindset that can figure out the feelings of others.
The opposite of this is intellectual narrow-mindedness which does not have the capacity to think broadly about the needs and situations of others. So, the correct option is intellectual narrow-mindedness.
Learn more about intellectual empathy here:
brainly.com/question/20047598
#SPJ1
Answer:B
Explanation:Voter turnout need to be high in people aged 18 to 29 years old.The answer cannot be C because voting does not matter in who is rich and who is poor,It does not also matter for who is in minority groups so the answer cannot be D too,It does not also matter about education so the answer is not A.The answer is B because if you are not up to 18,you cannot vote.
False pretense must be interpreted by the courts and some circumstances automatically qualify as a false pretense, such as bigamy, when one of the parties is married already. This breaks the marriage contract and qualifies for a voiding of the marriage. Claiming to be 'with child', is a false pretense if a child is not born within 10 months of marriage. Impotence may qualify for a false pretense ruling under certain circumstances. If the courts decide your marriage should never have taken place then you make seek an annulment. The best advice is to visit a lawyer.
