The total product cost per unit under absorption costing is: $75.
In absorption costing, the cost of every unit produced is worked out by adding up the direct cost of materials, direct labor, variable overhead, and the fixed overhead. Unlike in the case of marginal costing where the fixed cost is treated as period cost, in absorption costing, fixed cost is treated as a product cost.
The cost per unit
$
Direct material 28
Direct labor 24
Variable overhead 10
Fixed cost 13
Cost per unit 75
Cost of Inventory
Number of units = 1000
Cost per unit = $75
Value = 1000 * $75 = $75,000
Learn more about absorption costing here:brainly.com/question/26276034
#SPJ4
Answer:
The difference between two securities is 0.89%.
Explanation:
Inflation premium for the next three and five years:
Inflation premium (3) = (1.6% + 3.05% + 3.85%) ÷ 3
= 2.83%
Inflation premium (5) = (1.6% + 3.05% + 3.85% + 3.85% + 3.85%) ÷ 5
= 3.24%
Real risk-free rate = 2.35%
Since default premium and liquidity premium are zero on treasury bonds, we can now solve for the maturity risk premium:
Three-year Treasury securities = Real risk-free rate + Inflation premium (3) + MRP(3)
6.80% = 2.35% + 2.83% + MRP(3)
MRP (3) = 1.62%
Similarly,
5-year Treasury securities = Real risk-free rate + Inflation premium (5) + MRP(5)
8.10% = 2.35% + 3.24% + MRP(3)
MRP (5) = 2.51%
Thus,
MRP5 - MRP3 = 2.51% - 1.62%
= 0.89%
Therefore, the difference between two securities is 0.89%.
Answer:
There is a 0.2419% for a foreman to earn either $1,100 or $900
Explanation:
We calculate the probability of a normal distribution of 0;1
(X-mean)/deviation = Z
(1,100 - 1,000)/100 = 100/100 = 1
900 - 1,00/100 = -100/100 = -1
Given the zame Z value, we have the same probability of a foreman to earn 1,100 or 900
As we are asked for the foreman salary, wewill calcualte the Z for non cumulative, just the probability of a foreman to earn 1,100 or 900 dollars.
We look into the normal distribution table for the value of z = -1 or 1
0.002419707 = 0.2419%
Answer: $3,500
Explanation:
The American Opportunity Tax Credit is a credit offered by the IRS for educational expenses paid on qualified students in their first 4 years of tertiary education.
The credit offered stands at a 100% of the first $2,000 paid per student. Afterwards this drops to 25% for the next $2,000.
To be able to claim the full credit however, some income conditions must be met. The most relevant to this question is that your Modified Adjusted Gross Income (MAGI) should be $80,000 or less if filing singularly or $160,000 or less if jointly signing as a married couple.
That means that Kyle and Alyssa qualified for 100% of this credit.
They get to claim $1,000 on Jane.
For Jill they get to claim the first $2,000 and then 25% of the next $2,000,
= 25% * 2,000
= $500
= 500 + 2,000
= $2,500
They get to claim $2,500 on Jill.
Total of $3,500 for both Jane and Jill.
Answer: False
Explanation:
This seems to me like a True or False question and the answer would be False.
Payback period is calculated on the basis of the timing of cash flows and since we do not know the useful life of Project B neither do we know the timing of it's cash flows, we cannot say for certain that Project A has a shorter Payback period.
For example, the initial investment could be $5 million for instance but Project A only pays $10 million on its 5th year whereas Project B had a useful life of 4 years and paid $2 million each of those years. Meaning it would have paid back before the end of the 3rd year.
If you need any clarification do react or comment.
