Answer:
The right to speak.
Explanation:
With no other context than just this question, the right to speak is what someone needs to speak in a meeting with other persons.
This is something that is usually earned, the person willing to speak must be a respected individual, someone important within the organization having the meeting, or someone with something important to add to the conversation. Usually, during a business meeting, the only participants are the ones that make decisions, take leadership or have the right to give their opinion.
The Executive Branch is responsible for either signing a bill into law or rejecting (vetoing) it, in which case the house must reach a 2/3r'd's majority to force it into law.
There is no objective answer to this question, as both sides have arguments that support their views.
If you believe that you are bound by Hobbes' argument, it is because of tacit consent. Tacit consent means that, even though you have not explicitly agreed to follow laws, you have indicated your agreement through other means, for example, by using the public services of the government or by remaining within the limits of your country. Also, you could argue that any rational person would prefer to follow the rules of the government than to live in the state of nature. Therefore, if you are rational, your consent is assumed. Finally, you could also argue that while you did not explicitly agreed, maybe your ancestors did, which still binds you as a member of the same society.
On the other hand, if you believe that you are not bound by Hobbes' argument, you could argue that any contract that is not freely agreed upon is not valid. As the government uses force to make you act according to the law, you cannot be considered to be freely consenting. Also, you can argue that agreeing to follow some rules does not imply following <em>all</em> of the laws of the country. Finally, a common argument against Hobbes is the lack of empirical data. As we do not know if the state of nature is actually bad, or if the contract ever happened, the government cannot gain its legitimacy in that way.
Answer:
an attack by the soviet union
Explanation:
Even after World War II, the Soviet Union was a force to be respected. They have weapons of mass destruction and an extremely different view on how the world should be. We even went through the cold war after World War II for that exact reason.
Answer:
conservatives.
Explanation:
The basic ideology of the conservatives is that individuals consist of the basic unit of society and they are free to choose the laws of supply and demand. They believe that capitalism is the central institution of society. Therefore, the market system is comprised of individuals who work in their self-interest to maximize profit in an economic system.
