(what graph??) Carbon dioxide would more than likely drastically decrease.
Answer:
here's your answer
Explanation:
the estimated maximum energy efficiency of photosynthesis is the energy stored per mole of oxygen evolved, 117/450, or 26 percent.
Consequently, plants can at best absorb only about 34 percent of the incident sunlight. The actual percentage of solar energy stored by plants is much less than the maximum energy efficiency of photosynthesis. An agricultural crop in which the biomass (total dry weight) stores as much as 1 percent of total solar energy received on an annual areawide basis is exceptional, although a few cases of higher yields (perhaps as much as 3.5 percent in sugarcane) have been reported. There are several reasons for this difference between the predicted maximum efficiency of photosynthesis and the actual energy stored in biomass. First, more than half of the incident sunlight is composed of wavelengths too long to be absorbed, and some of the remainder is reflected or lost to the leaves
Answer:
i wish i could help i don't know
Explanation:
Option A cannot be true since a scientific hypothesis must be testable, otherwise it is not scientific.
Option C is incorrect as well as scientific knowledge DOES need peer review and verification before the results are accepted by the scientific community.
Option D is also false as science is always changing and adapting. What this means is that conclusions or understandings can be changed if new evidence surfaces that suggests otherwise.
Therefore, the only correct answer is B) Explanations are based on observations, evidence, and testing.
This is true as we cannot make statements or explanations in science without first conducting tests, making observations and gathering evidence to support our claims.
