Answer:
See below
Explanation:
1. The current ratio is the sum of current assets divided by current liabilities. It used to measure the ability of the airlines accessories to meet its short term obligation due within a year
Current ratio = $93 million + $85 million + $9 million / $80 million + $26 million
Current ratio = $187 million / $106 million
Current ratio = 1.76:1
Current ratio = 1.76 times
2. Acid test ratio. This measure liquidity but with adjustment for risky current assets i.e Inventory
Acid test ratio = Current assets - Inventories / Current liabilities
Acid test ratio = ($187 million - $173 million) / $106 million
Acid test ratio = $14 million / $106 million
Acid test ratio = 0.13:1
Acid test ratio = 0.13 times
Answer:
Three part test.
The outcome: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
At the end, the law will be held.
Explanation:
In some cases, the courts are allowed to protect individual, company or business organization from Government interrupting with these individuals or business organization "fundamental right" and this is the "substantive due process rights " of insurance companies as mentioned in the question above.
The test that the United State Supreme Court can use to determine whether the regulations they want to enact would violate the substantive due process rights of insurance companies is what is known as the THREE PARR TEST.
THE THREE PART TEST has its root from cases such as that of Pasgraf V Long Island Railroad co. The three part test involves three main subjects and they are;
=> foreseeability: are the policies in which insurance companies work going to affect the consumers in the future?
=> proximity: what kind of relationship do the insurance companies have with there consumers?
=> fairness: are these policies just and fair?
CONCLUSION: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
Answer:
Increase duration of the bank assets
Explanation:
Because When the duration of assets is longer than the duration of liabilities, this allows for a the duration gap is positive. And so even if interest rates rise, assets will lose more value than liabilities, hence reducing the value of the firm's equity.