The communication revolution assumed a part in globalization by enabling individuals to spread thoughts and societies. A case of this is Christianity to Africa.
Amid the nineteenth century, a progression of mechanical developments significantly reshaped the way individuals convey at a worldwide level. New methods for correspondence speeded the pace of life and expanded exchange and the trading of thoughts.
Clearly the embargo<span> wasn't working. It was hurting America rather than its intended targets, Britain and France. In March 1809, Congress repealed the </span>Embargo Act of 1807. Jefferson signed the repeal shortly before he left office.<span>the embargo failed to have a significant effect on the British. Goods still reached Great Britain through illegal shipments; British trade was not suffering as much as the framers of the embargo had intended.</span>
First, they argued that the white Americans (and their black slaves) needed the land and could make better use of it. They argued that Americans could make the land more economically productive than the Indians had been able to. Second, the proponents argued from the idea of white superiority. They argued that the Indians were inferior and that it was not necessary to treat them fairly.
In my opinion <span>it gave too much power to the federal government and parts of it (the bank) were unconstitutional.</span>
