The resources used to create wealth are collectively referred to as

At Haddon, Inc., the office workers are employed for a 40-hour workweek and are paid on either an annual, monthly, or hourly bas

levacccp [35]

Answer:

Employee Salary Hrs. Worked Cumulative Taxable

Wages as of Last Pay Period

King, M. $135,200 (year) 40 $132,600.00

Manera, E. $6,500 (month) 40 $76,500.00

Tate, S. $3,900 (month) 48 $45,900.00

Yee, L. $12.50 (hour) 44.5 $27,675.13

Diaz, R. $12.50 (hour) 48 $14,778.96

Zagst, J. $14.50 (hour) 52 $24,703.02

(a) regular earnings,

King, M. $135,200 / 52 weeks = $2,600

Manera, E. $1,500 weekly salary

Tate, S. $900

Yee, L. $12.50 x 40 = $500

Diaz, R. $12.50 x 40 = $500

Zagst, J. $14.50 x 40 = $580

(b) overtime earnings,

King, M. $0

Manera, E. $0

Tate, S. [($900 / 40) x 8 x 1.5] = $270

Yee, L. $12.50 x 4.5 x 1.5 = $84.38

Diaz, R. $12.50 x 8 x 1.5 = $150

Zagst, J. $14.50 x 12 x 1.5 = $261

(c) total regular and overtime earnings,

King, M. $2,600

Manera, E. $1,500

Tate, S. $1,170

Yee, L. $584.38

Diaz, R. $650

Zagst, J. $841

(d) FICA taxable wages (the FICA taxes limit for 2020 is $137,700, so everyone will be taxed)

King, M. $2,600

Manera, E. $1,500

Tate, S. $1,170

Yee, L. $584.38

Diaz, R. $650

Zagst, J. $841

(e) FICA taxes to be withheld

King, M. $2,600 x 7.65% = $198.90

Manera, E. $1,500 x 7.65% = $114.75

Tate, S. $1,170 x 7.65% = $89.51

Yee, L. $584.38 x 7.65% = $44.71

Diaz, R. $650 x 7.65% = $49.73

Zagst, J. $841 x 7.65% = $64.34

(f) net pay for the week ended

King, M. $2,600 - $198.90 = $2,401.10

Manera, E. $1,500 - $114.75 = $1,385.25

Tate, S. $1,170 - $89.51 = $1,080.49

Yee, L. $584.38 - $44.71 = $539.67

Diaz, R. $650 - $49.73 = $600.27

Zagst, J. $841 - $64.34 = $776.66

3 0

3 years ago

A father and mother are planning a savings program to put their daughter through college. Their daughter is now 8 years old. She

Anna71 [15]

Answer:

$4,102.57

Explanation:

we must first calculate the future costs of college:

cost of college year 1 = $16,200 x (1 + 2%)¹⁰ = $19,747.71

cost of college year 2 = $19,747.71 x 1.02 = $20,142.66

cost of college year 3 = $20,142.66 x 1.02 = $20,545.51

cost of college year 4 = $20,545.51 x 1.02 = $20,956.42

in order to determine how much money does the family need to have before college starts we must discount the cost of college by 7.5%:

PV cost of college year 1 = $19,747.71

PV cost of college year 2 = 20,142.66 / 1.075 = $18,737.36

PV cost of college year 3 = $20,545.51 / 1.075² = $17,778.70

PV cost of college year 4 = $20,956.42 / 1.075³ = $16,869.09

total = $73,132.86

the future value of the grandmother's deposits:

$13,000 x (1 + 7.5%)¹⁴ = $35,781.77

$2,900 x (1 + 7.5%)¹² = $6,907.16

total = $42,688.93

that means that you will need to save $73,132.86 - $42,688.93 = $30,443.93 by the time your child turns 18

you will make 4 deposits and their future value will be:

deposit x 1.075¹⁰ = 2.0610D

deposit x 1.075⁹ = 1.9172D

deposit x 1.075⁸ = 1.7835D

deposit x 1.075⁷ = 1.6590D

total = 7.4207D

yearly deposit = $30,443.93 / 7.4207 = $4,102.57

4 0

2 years ago

Gullett Corporation had $37,000 of raw materials on hand on November 1. During the month, the Corporation purchased an additiona

Vlada [557]

Answer: See explanation

Explanation:

The journal entry to record the purchase of raw materials is analysed below:

November:

Dr Raw materials $86000

Cr Cash or account payable $86000

It should be noted that as the raw material is increasing, the raw material account will be debited while as the cash or account payable I decreasing, it is credited.

8 0

2 years ago

Who wants to zoom meeting id password will be avaliable everyday 8:00-9:30

Karo-lina-s [1.5K]

OKAYYYY SEEEEE YUUUuuu thrreeer

7 0

2 years ago

Free trade proponents and protectionists have drastically different views regarding trade. Which side of the debate do you side

zvonat [6]

Answer:

Protectionist.

Explanation:

Proponents of protectionist argue that allowing free trade will kill local industries and also make the country for dumping ground for cheaper foreign made goods.

They suggested imposition of heavy tariffs so as to protect local industries. Protecting local industries will create jobs for the unemployed thereby making them relevant to the society.

By imposing high tariffs, foreign companies producing those goods would pass the burden to final consumers in form of high prices hence discourage consumers from buying them. Few of those goods will then enter the country due to the heavy duty and low patronage.

Imposition of heavy tariffs will also generate more revenue for the government which will be used to financed basic infrastructures like housing, sewage system, electricity, etc.

Although proponents of free trade are of the opinion that there should be no restriction to trading among countries. They also suggested the removal of high tariffs from goods exported from other country.

The above seems good, yet the consequences outweigh the gain therein. For instance, removal of duty or tariff would result in revenue loss for the government hence unable to finance basic infrastructures. The country will also become dumping ground for imported goods because they will sold at lower price due to it's poor quality.

6 0

2 years ago