Answer:
1. Her return on investment is 20%
2. $40,000
Explanation:
1. We have Return on Investment = Net income from the Investment / The invested amount.
The net income is clearly stated in the Question which is the after-tax profit at $20,000.
The invested amount of Amelia is the amount she invested in Goodies Gift Shop which is illustrated as net worth ( owner's equity) at $100,000 in the Balance Sheet (Year 2).
As we have Return on Investment = 20,000/100,000 = 20%
2. We have the projected pre-tax profit = Projected margin - total overhead = 250K - 200K = $50,000
The after-tax profit = pre-tax profit x (1- tax rate) = 50K x (1-20%) = $40,000
By trying to preserve the architectural style of the area and the paintings, this is an example of Aesthetic zoning
<u>What is Aesthetic zoning?</u>
Tis is a type of zoning that is made to conform with architectural landscapes. The aim of this type of zoning is for the preservation of the aesthetics of the community.
This type of zoning is mostly done in those residential areas that are planned.
Read more on Aesthetic zoning here:
brainly.com/question/1326387
In my opinion, it is called subtle discrimination. Unlike blatant discrimination, which consists in openly humiliating a member of a minority based on their personal traits, subtle discrimination is much more perfidious, as it is not always easy to point finger at it or to legally assess it. Sometimes, it even happens as a consequence of seemingly good intentions. For example, if I use lower standards to grade Afro-Americans in a class of mixed students, it still means I assume they are less capable or educated, even if I do it because I know that they had been oppressed and had historically had less chance to educate themselves.
The applicable formula is;
A = P(1-r)^n
Where;
A = Final purchasing power
P = Current purchasing power
r = inflation
n = Number of years when P changes to A
Confirming the first claim:
A = 1/2P (to be confirmed)
P = $3
r = 7% = 0.07
n = 10.25 years
Using the formula;
A = 3(1-0.07)^10.25 = 3(0.475) ≈ 3(0.5) = $1.5
And therefore, A = 1/2P after 10.25 years.
Now, give;
P = $9
A = 1/4P = $9/4 = $2.25
r = 6.5% = 0.065
n = ? (nearest year).
Substituting;
2.25 = 9(1-0.065)^n
2.25/9 = (1-0.065)^n
0.25 = (1-0.065)^n
ln (0.25)= n ln(1-0.065)
-1.3863 = -0.0672n
n = (-1.3863)/(-0.0672) = 20.63 years
To nearest year;
n = 21 years
Therefore, it would take approximately 21 years fro purchasing power to reduce by 4. That is, from $9 to $2.25.
Answer:
Certain records require employee privacy to be protected. Not maintaining and following best practices for employee record keeping leaves you vulnerable to defending yourself against lawsuits, labor investigations or audits.
Explanation:
