Stare decisis is a legal doctrine that necessitates courts to follow historical cases when creating a ruling on a similar current or future case. Stare decisis safeguards that cases with identical facts be approached in the same way, except overruled by the same court or a higher court such as the US Supreme Court. Simply put, it binds courts to follow legal precedents set by previous decisions. Stare decisis is a Latin term meaning "to stand by that which is decided". The US common law system has a integrated system of determining legal matters from the principle of stare decisis and precedent. A past ruling or judgment on any circumstance is known as a precedent. Stare decisis commands that courts look to precedent when overseeing an on-going case with similar circumstances.
Answer: authoritative parent
Explanation:Mazie's mom set reasonable demand since she is loving and caring which means she expect the best from her child and as a loving parent she probably trust her child since she also allows verbal give and take.
She involves her child in decision making and allow her to express her own views.
Answer:
The main point here on the appeal would be the fact that the Sherrods decided to stay silent on the last offer made by the Kidds to settle the situation, and rather decided to go ahead and look for a mandatory arbitration. When the Sherrods did that, the Kidds might have understood that they were not accepting their offer for 34.000 dollars and preffered to settle for the result of the mandatory arbitration, which established the price at 25.000 dollars.
Another point is that there was a big time lapse between the last offer made by the Kidds to settle with the Sherrods and their communicating that they would go for that final settlement offer, especially after the mandatory arbitration had already established a new price. This time lapse should also be taken in favor of the Kidds in their appeal
Finally, the matter should have ended when the final decision for the arbitration was given
So it should be expected that on appeal the decision reached in the mandatory arbritration be upheld, instead of the new sum which was initially assumed not accepted by the Sherrods when they went through with the arbitration.
Answer:
The answer is social movement theory.
Explanation:
The social movement theory is generally used to explain why a number of people who work together to create or stop a social change, either succeed or fail with the human resources available to them as a collective group. Social movement theory helps to provide reasons why social mobilization and relationships occur in the first place, and why their results manifest. In addition, social movement theory could give insight about possible social, economic, cultural, and political consequences that could arise from social mobilization.
False because your still using drugs
