Answer:
Portuguese
Explanation:
But THe Yoruba culture is amazingggg
Answer:
Equality in treatment, Limits on noneconomic damages and tort caps are three tort reforms in state or federal courts that I would support
Explanation:
Three proposals for tort reforms in state or federal courts that I would support are -
Equality in treatment – It is essential to support all individuals who get affected by natural calamities and were not compensated while on the other hand the individuals affected during human oriented crisis were compensated for their loss.
Limits on noneconomic damages – This reform was oriented to reduce the malpractice settlements and premium rates of insurance companies.
Tort Caps – This reform ensured caps or a price ceiling, on damages in case of non economic damages.
Answer:
1. In<u>ductive argument</u>.
2. <u>Inductive argument.</u>
3. <u>Deductve argument.</u>
Explanation:
1. This argument is inductive. The conclusion is a generalization, that is drawn by a premise, the premise has been obtained out of experimentation.
If two grains of sand have diamons, it doesn´t mean the entire beach is made of them. This argument is not strong because the conclusion is not accurate.
2. This is a deductive argument. This type of argument depends on the logic struture of it. If the premise were to be true, the conclusion would be true also.
It is not a sound argument, because thanksgiving happends every fourth thursday of november. It is an invalid argument because the premise is false, there for the concusion is false.
3. This is an invalid deductive argument. The premise is incorrect, so the conclusion that is being deduce from it is also wrong. It is not a sound argument because if you double the length of the sides of a square, the area would quatriple.
This most be on the worksheet or paper you received
