Marta is making an argument for a job candidate she likes. she tells the other members of the hiring committee that all utsa graduates are trained in a <u>syllogism</u>.
A syllogism is a form of logical argument that applies deductive reasoning to arrive at an end primarily based on propositions that are asserted or assumed to be real.
In its earliest form, syllogism arises whilst two true premises (propositions or statements) validly imply a conclusion or the principle point that the argument objectives to get across.
For instance, knowing that everyone guys are mortal (primary premise) and that Socrates is a person (minor premise), we might also validly conclude that Socrates is mortal. Syllogistic arguments are commonly represented in a 3-line form.
Learn more about syllogism here: brainly.com/question/361872
#SPJ4
it depends what type of service. And the service would have to make sure they are good enough to pay the government back like a mall jewelry shop store.
Jessie’s idea is an example of "Moral objectivity".
<span>
Moral objectivism is the position that moral certainties exist independantly from sentiment.
There are a few adaptations of moral objectivism, of shifting levels of strentgth from weakest to most grounded:
Moral universalism
Moral authenticity
Moral absolutism
One general point about moral objectivism is that the position does not manage that a particular good certainties exist, nor does it suggest that any or every single moral truth are known.</span>
Answer:
The answer is: The state of Georgia had no legal power over the Cherokee
brainliest if its correct :D