Which statement about the Missouri Compromise 1820 is most accurate

History

2 answers:

Tems11 [23]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

The Missouri Compromise was an agreement passed in 1820 between pro-slavery and pro-abolitionist groups in the United States, primarily involving the regulation of slave labor in the western territories.

While the warmer southern states had their economy heavily focused on agriculture and therefore with large numbers of slave labor, the Northerners had a more trade-based industry and non-slave-based education that, with time, was accelerating the differences of interests between both regions, and the commitment came to consecrate the division, prohibiting slavery above the 36º30' North parallel.

Vitek1552 [10]3 years ago

4 0

It seems that you have missed the given options for this question, but anyway here is the answer. The statement about the Missouri Compromise 1820 that is most accurate would be this: <span>By admitting both a slave state and a free state, the nation's legislature hoped to keep a balance of power. Hope this answer helps. </span>

You might be interested in

What type of government allows the executive branch to rule without being accountable to the legislative branch?

Vesna [10]

Answer:

Presidential - a system of government where the executive branch exists separately from a legislature (to which it is generally not accountable).

5 0

3 years ago

Can we say that Christopher Columbus was a bad person based on our modern morals and goals in

levacccp [35]

Answered

he committed genocide so yes. that to me says he’s a bad person

Explanation:

8 0

2 years ago

What language did the paleo people speak

Anni [7]

paleo_ European language

Explanation:

The Paleo-European languages, or Old European languages, are the mostly unknown languages that were spoken in Europe prior to the spread of the Indo-European and Uralic families caused by the Bronze Age invasion from the Eurasian steppe of pastoralists whose descendant languages dominate the continent today.[1]

The term Old European languages is also often used more narrowly to refer only to the unknown languages of the first Neolithic European farmers in Southern, Western and Central Europe and the Balkan Peninsula, who emigrated from Anatolia around 9000–6000 BC, excluding unknown languages of various European hunter gatherers who were eventually absorbed by farming populations by the late Neolithic Age.

A similar term, Pre-Indo-European, is used to refer to the disparate languages mostly displaced by speakers of Proto-Indo-European as they migrated out of the Urheimat. This term thus includes certain Paleo-European languages along with many others spoken in West Asia, Central Asia, and South Asia before the Proto-Indo-Europeans and their descendants arrived.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

this battle while considered a draw caused the japanease to postpone their invasion of port moresby indefinetly

Alchen [17]

The correct answer is the Battle of the Coral Sea

Although both sides were winners in certain respects, it was a draw in the end which was a bad thing for Japan. The Japanese army had a tactical victory through the numbers of US troops defeated and ships sunk, the US had a strategic victory because Japan could not prepare for the following battles because of the losses suffered in this one.

5 0

3 years ago

What did Alfred Thayer Mahan recommend with regard to the US military

kotykmax [81]

Alfred Thayer Mahan recommended that the American military should focus on sea-power as the key to its success in any contemporary or future conflicts.

6 0

3 years ago