The enlightenment idea of separation of powers led to ~ the forming of 3 branches of government
White, viewers were less animated when watching a 17-minute film clip of the 1992 riots in los angeles,According to darnell hunt's research on audiences.
Which element of Darnell Hunt's audience study stood out, especially in terms of the way he analyzed and interpreted the data? In addition to finding racial disparities in attitudes, he also examined how they were expressed.
The killings and trial, which one producer for NBC's Today called "the biggest story I have ever seen," were widely covered by the media right away. At least one instant book was suggested two hours after the victims were discovered and was due to be published only a few weeks later. The case marked a turning point in reality television history. For more than 300 days following the killings, The Los Angeles Times ran coverage of the case on its front page. The case received more airtime on the Big Three television networks' nightly newscasts than the Bosnian War and the Oklahoma City bombing put together.
Learn more about audiences brainly.com/question/1802560
#SPJ4
After Augustus's death in 14 C.E., other Roman emperors ruled with varying effectiveness. ... In fact, a series of leaders known as the Five Good Emperors ruled in succession and presided over a prolonged period of peace and prosperity. The last of these emperors, Marcus Aurelius, was the final emperor of the Pax Romana.
Answer:
a. A non-reductionist, credulist about testimony
Explanation:
The term 'Lackey' existed in the United States during 1500s to define the male person who works as a servant or a male slave. Lackey was a uniform male servant, especially a liveried footman.
A lackey is not wise person and is often used as a slang. He is always credulist about any testimonies and evidences. He acts as a non reductionist.
The answer is, in the particular case of the Koran, is more complex than a very Manichean yes or no. The reason is that according to core Islamic theology, the Koran is the direct, verbal revelation of Allah (Islamic God) to Muhammad and it establishes a set of religious principles that are considered to be literal, universal, perfect and thus unchangeable since it would be a mortal sin to change the perfect “word of God”. In most Islamic countries, Islam is considered by their constitution to be the sole and/or major source of legislation for all spheres of society and since Islam is the perfect, immutable, infallible and final revelation of God to humanity it is <em>haram </em>to question it. Now, there is Sharia law which has four different sources:
- The Koran.
- The <em>Sunnah </em>(those <em>hadiths </em>who are considered authentic).
- The <em>Qiyas </em>(analytical reasoning of the former two).
- The <em>Jima </em>(the juridical consensus of the previous analysis).
In a nutshell, there is the direct word of God, then there are the actions, words and deeds of its prophet Muhammad (the hadith) and then there is the traditional examination of such precepts by Islamic Scholars and the consensus achieved after such examination. Officially, according to Fundamentalist Islamic traditionalists, no interpretation can be made of that but since there are several schools of thought in Islam, there are <em>de facto</em> different interpretations and also there is the fact that in the modern world Islamic countries have combined Islamic jurisprudence with Western jurisprudence which is not considered to be divine therefor the answer would be a yes, but a yes that contemplates such caveats. Furthermore, the extreme schism between fundamentalist Islamic traditionalists and more moderate law makers leaves the question unanswered until one of these groups prevail.
